Format compatible avec la plupart des logiciels Magic, y compris Magic Workstation et Cockatrice:
For MTG Arena:
For Magic Online (MTGO):
Autres
Afin d'enregistrer votre deck dans un tournoi officiel ("DCI-sanctioned"), vous avez besoin d'un fiche d'enregistrement ("Deck sheet") Télécharger ici un deck sheet pré-rempli avec les cartes de votre deck!
Nota Bene: Ce service n'est pas un service officiel de la DCI. Veuillez bous assurer que votre deck sheet contient toutes les cartes de votre deck et est homologué par la DCI. En cas d'erreur ou de problème, n'hésitez pas à nous contacter! DCI is a trademark of of Wizards of the Coast LLC.
Révision affichée: 98. There is a more recent version of this deck.
The main goal of this deck is to enhance interactions by combat, while deterring opponents to attack the crown. This decklist was carefully built with a budget in mind (~150 euros from cardmarket) and tries to improve the game experience of all players around the table while maintaining a decent power level (this is not a group hug).
For these reasons, you'll see that this decklist varies significantly from other Queen Marchesa's decks, mostly by restricting the amount of stax, aikido and increasing the political and combat based archetype.
The main strength of this deck is to never be too threatening to the group. For these reason a lot of group hate cards are not included because we do not want to draw attention towards us. This makes it a strong deck in multiplayer games, where due to its high amount of interactions it will help us create alliances and turn opponents against each other. Thanks to these politics, it often lets us finish in 1v1 situations where we can finish our opponent through combat or burst.
In the following sections I've grouped cards by the main ideas this decks wants to do:
WORK IN PROGRESS
Looks like a controversial title but I'll try to explain myself. In previous versions of this decklist, I was running cards like Wound Reflection or Kambal, Consul of Allocation, which are very strong but come
with a drawback: shifting the table attention towards the Queen. This is completely the opposite of what this deck wants to do ! Most of the time, if your pod has a good threat assessment these kind of permanents will be destroyed before one table turn. So if you're not using them to directly finish the game I think these cards anti-synergies with the deck, which is why I've replaced Wound Reflection with Dictate of the Twin Gods that I always use with flash to finish the game.
In contrary, "weaker" permanents are much more suitable here (and by weaker I mean permanents that don't directly create a big threat) . They have two main advantages: first they are less likely to be targeted by removal, second they usually have a lower CMC.
Take for example Sphere of Safety and Spear of Heliod. The first cost 2 more mana and is often much better at preventing players from attacking you. For these reasons Sphere of Safety is card that will be seen as a "problem" for all my opponents and likely to get removed. On the other hand, the Spear of Heliod is a tool of dissuasion which can become political: say for example, "If you don't remove it, I will not destroy this creature with the spear". So opponents will often want to keep their removal for stronger permanents and even if they do remove it, you only lost 3 manas to cast it not 5.
After multiples games, your pod will likely understand that apart from big X finisher spells, you're not going to be a direct threat to the group. For these reasons it's usually a deck that will not get targeted first and likely to stay long enough to have a important impact on the game whether it wins or not.
One of the Great advantages of building with a budget restriction is to look for alternative cheaper cards. I personally much prefer running little bit weaker alternatives that fit a theme of my deck than staples that are auto-included in 90% of Mardu decks (like Wrath of God for example). Bear in mind, that this is my personal opinion and if you prefer to run your staples like most of my pod do, just go for it.
Although sometimes there are just not any good alternative to a staple, most of the times I believe you can find a card that has almost the same effect without loosing too much power level.
Take Promise of Loyalty for example, it's a 5 CMC boardwipe that leaves one creature for each player. In most decks and situations it'll be seen as a much weaker version than Wrath of God. However in this Queen Marchesa decklist which wants opponents to attack each other the card becomes much stronger: it reads "sacrifices" instead of "destroy" and prevents the remaining creatures from attacking us basically granting two desirable effects from a single card.
Don't misunderstand me, in some cases staples are so broken that removing them will clearly lower the power of your deck. You'll see for example that I'm running Anguished Unmaking, Swords to Plowshares, Grim Tutor, etc... However because I wanted to run 11 removals, at some point the 10th and 11th staples were relatively bad enough for me to consider spicier alternatives. So I've replaced them with cards like Council's Judgment that greatly improves the interaction and fun of the game for everyone and Soul Snare which is an insanely good card specifically for this deck.
Finally being on a budget forced me to search for alternatives of expensive cards. When I started looking for tutors I knew that I couldn't afford Demonic Tutor, but at the same time Diabolic Tutor felt like an absurdly worse version. The alternative I've found: the transmute mechanic from Shred Memory. I've basically build my deck around it, preferring every 2 CMC cards over others : looking for a finisher ? Go find Torment of Hailfire, 2CMC. Protection for your permanents ? Boros Charm, 2CMC. A removal ? Vanishing Verse, Terminate, etc... A Boardwipe ? Starstorm ! I'm not affraid to say that in this deck, Shred Memory is an uncounterable Grim Tutor that doesn't tax your life.
2-sided (coin flip) | |
---|---|
6-sided (d6) | |
20-sided (d20) | |
Sides: |
Double-click to open card details.
Nom | Main | Tour 1 | Tour 2 | Tour 3 | Tour 4 | Tour 5 | Tour 6 | Tour 7 | Tour 8 | Tour 9 | Tour 10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Probabilités aditionnelles |
Please add some cards to the deck to see card suggestions.
Score | Nom de Carte | Catégorie | Mana | Rareté | Salt |
---|
Comparer | Révision | Créé | Par | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Révision 135 | Juillet 30, 2023 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 134 | Juillet 30, 2023 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 133 | Mars 1, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 132 | Mars 1, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 131 | Mars 1, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 130 | Mars 1, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 129 | Mars 1, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 127 | Février 28, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 126 | Février 26, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 125 | Février 26, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 124 | Février 26, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 123 | Février 26, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 122 | Février 25, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 121 | Février 25, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 120 | Février 25, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 119 | Février 24, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 118 | Février 24, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 117 | Février 23, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 116 | Février 22, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 115 | Février 22, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 114 | Février 22, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 113 | Février 21, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 112 | Février 21, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 111 | Septembre 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 110 | Septembre 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 109 | Septembre 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 108 | Septembre 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 107 | Septembre 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 106 | Septembre 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 105 | Septembre 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 104 | Septembre 26, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 103 | Septembre 25, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 102 | Septembre 25, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 101 | Septembre 25, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 100 | Septembre 25, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 99 | Septembre 25, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
» | Révision 98 | Septembre 25, 2021 | Kyiwa | |||
Révision 97 | Septembre 24, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 96 | Septembre 20, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 95 | Septembre 17, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 94 | Septembre 17, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 93 | Septembre 16, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 92 | Septembre 11, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 91 | Septembre 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 90 | Août 23, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 88 | Août 22, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 87 | Août 21, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 86 | Août 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 85 | Août 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 84 | Août 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 83 | Août 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 82 | Août 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 81 | Août 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 80 | Juillet 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 79 | Juillet 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 78 | Juillet 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 77 | Juillet 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 76 | Juillet 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 75 | Juillet 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 74 | Juillet 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 73 | Juillet 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 72 | Juillet 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 71 | Juillet 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 70 | Juillet 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 69 | Juillet 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 68 | Juillet 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 67 | Juillet 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 66 | Juillet 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 65 | Juillet 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 64 | Juillet 27, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 63 | Juin 9, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 62 | Juin 9, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 61 | Mai 30, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 60 | Mai 16, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 59 | Mai 16, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 58 | Mai 16, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 57 | Mai 14, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 56 | Mai 14, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 55 | Mai 14, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 54 | Mai 14, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 53 | Mai 14, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 52 | Mai 11, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 51 | Mai 11, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 50 | Mai 11, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 49 | Mai 11, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 48 | Mai 11, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 47 | Mai 8, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 46 | Mai 8, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 44 | Mai 8, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 43 | Mai 7, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 42 | Mai 7, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 41 | Mai 7, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 40 | Mai 6, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 39 | Mai 6, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 38 | Mai 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 37 | Mai 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 35 | Mai 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 34 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 33 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 32 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 31 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 30 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 29 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 28 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 27 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 26 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 25 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 24 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 23 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 22 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 21 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 20 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 19 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 18 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 17 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 16 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 15 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 14 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 13 | Mai 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 12 | Mai 3, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 11 | Mai 3, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 10 | Mai 3, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 8 | Mai 2, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 7 | Mai 2, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 6 | Mai 2, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 5 | Mai 2, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 3 | Mai 2, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 2 | Mai 2, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Révision 1 | Mai 2, 2021 | Kyiwa |