deckstats.net
You need to be logged in to do this.
The buttons above will open in a new window. Please return to this window after you have logged in. When you have logged in, click the Refresh Session button and then try again.

For most Magic software, including Magic Workstation and Cockatrice:

For MTG Arena:

For Magic Online (MTGO):

For others:

To play your deck at an official ("DCI-sanctioned") tournament you need a deck registration sheet. Here you can download such a sheet pre-filled with the cards in this deck!

(-> Your Settings)

Please note: This is not an official DCI service. So please always make extra sure that the sheet contains all the cards in your deck and fulfils all DCI requirements. If you notice anything wrong, please let us know. DCI is a trademark of of Wizards of the Coast LLC.

Please select the columns you would like to see:

"Quick" Backstory: I've wanted to build a lantern control deck ever since I started playing (which was about when Lantern Control came out). I love the idea of control, and LC is the best kind of control. I wasn't going to build it, though, because it is kinda a superdouche deck. But then the people in my playgroup started building crazy horsecrap decks (8-rack, ubermill, anything Jeskai) so I was like "Fine, if they insist on building these, then I will try to build a deck that they can't beat." I put more time, effort, and research into this than any of the other decks. And I'm still going. Love this deck.

The idea, for those who don't know, is to use Lantern of Insight combined with Codex Shredder and Goulcaller's Bell to mill good cards into your graveyard, and make sure your opponent only ever draws crap cards. Mana flood them, or mana starve them. Or leave them with 2 mana and a hand full of 9+ cards. It's up to you!

I always wanted to make a lantern control deck. I know, it's a terrible deck. I know. I get it. But it's so, so, SO much fun! Plus, I'm stuck in a playgroup of people who insist on playing decks like 8rack and UB Mill and Jeskai Ascendancy. Just the worse kind of people. So I figured I'd try to make a deck that is equally frustrating. Some insight into my logic:

Extirpate v Surgical Extraction: I know they both "do" the same thing. Surgical extraction is nice because you can use it w/o mana, which is nice in a pinch. I put extirpate in, though, because it's essentially unstoppable (counters, redirects, abilities can't be put on the stack while it's on the stack. Importantly, too, is that it has had alot of success vs. certain storm combos, the main one being grapeshot. There's been quite a few games where Grapeshot was the last ditch effort, and I was able to extirpate right before they cast, or right after they case (and before remand), and it took the game.

Thoughtseize v Distress/Duress: although Dist/Duress are nice budget alternatives, I find it's really hard to beat inquisition as a turn one "what does my opponent have?" It's nice and cheap, and gets rid of the early game scary spells.

Sideboard is designed to combat various tricks that the deck usually falls prey to. The deck typically wins game 1, then they side in hate. Evil presence gives you a way to deal with lands that maybe you really don't want tapped. Tron is when I usually use it.

Tags

Sideboard

This deck does not appear to be legal in Modern.

Problems: Mox Opal is banned.

Turn: Your life: Opponent's life: Poison counters:
Hand (0)
Library (0)
Graveyard (0)
Exile (0)
Board (0)

Name

Type

Notes

Power

Toughness

card

Type

Notes

Power

Toughness

 

Counters

Move this card to:

Actions

2-sided (coin flip)
6-sided (d6)
20-sided (d20)
Sides:

Auto-draw

Auto-untap

Double-click to open card details.

Move selected to:

Combined probability

Min. amount:
Card:

Custom calculation

If I play a card times in my ? card deck, how likely am I to draw it times?
  Name Hand Turn 1 Turn 2 Turn 3 Turn 4 Turn 5 Turn 6 Turn 7 Turn 8 Turn 9 Turn 10

Additional Probabilities

Embed Into Forums or Website

For forums and blogs please select one of the BB-Code options. For websites and forums that support HTML (e.g. Wizards Community Forums) you can use the HTML options.

Link to this deck

These are the all the revisions of this deck. Click on a revision to view the deck as it looked back then.
  Compare Revision Created By
» Revision 24 July 2, 2016 Mostlynotgay
Revision 23 July 2, 2016 Mostlynotgay
Revision 22 June 29, 2016 Mostlynotgay
Revision 21 June 29, 2016 Mostlynotgay
Revision 20 June 27, 2016 Mostlynotgay
Revision 19 June 27, 2016 Mostlynotgay
Revision 18 June 24, 2016 Mostlynotgay
Revision 17 June 22, 2016 Mostlynotgay
Revision 16 June 21, 2016 Mostlynotgay
Revision 15 March 22, 2016 Mostlynotgay
Revision 14 February 9, 2016 Mostlynotgay
Revision 13 December 15, 2015 Mostlynotgay
Revision 12 December 8, 2015 Mostlynotgay
Revision 11 December 1, 2015 Mostlynotgay
Revision 10 November 30, 2015 Mostlynotgay
Revision 9 November 28, 2015 Mostlynotgay
Revision 8 November 28, 2015 Mostlynotgay
Revision 7 November 28, 2015 Mostlynotgay
Revision 6 November 28, 2015 Mostlynotgay
Revision 5 November 27, 2015 Mostlynotgay
Revision 4 November 27, 2015 Mostlynotgay
Revision 3 November 27, 2015 Mostlynotgay
Revision 2 November 26, 2015 Mostlynotgay
Revision 1 November 26, 2015 Mostlynotgay
There are no comments about this deck yet.
English card names will be linked automatically.
In addition, you can use BBCode (like [b][/b], [url=...][/url] and so on) here.

An error with your login session occured:
unknown
You can do this in a different tab to avoid losing the data you entered here. Once you are done, click the Refresh Session button and then try again.
If the problem persists, please contact us.