deckstats.net
You need to be logged in to do this.
The buttons above will open in a new window. Please return to this window after you have logged in. When you have logged in, click the Refresh Session button and then try again.

Call of the void (EDH / Commander)

For most Magic software, including Magic Workstation and Cockatrice:

For MTG Arena:

For Magic Online (MTGO):

For others:

To play your deck at an official ("DCI-sanctioned") tournament you need a deck registration sheet. Here you can download such a sheet pre-filled with the cards in this deck!

(-> Your Settings)

Please note: This is not an official DCI service. So please always make extra sure that the sheet contains all the cards in your deck and fulfils all DCI requirements. If you notice anything wrong, please let us know. DCI is a trademark of of Wizards of the Coast LLC.

Please select the columns you would like to see:

The first thing you might notice might be the commander, the fact it’s five colors or the relatively low price tag. That was not the intent, but is a consequence of the construction process.

The deck was created with the intent of both creating a five-color deck, and using no “Staples” of the commander format. It was made shortly before the release of Battlebond, and slightly tweaked since, but no major changes has been made, Kaya and Game Plan being the two big additions.

So, let’s start with the commander… O-Kagachi, Vengeful Kami was chosen because he is one of the least played five colors commanders. In fact, according to EDHREC’s data, he’s the third to last official five color commander, only better than Atogatog and Sliver Legion. As both of those are clearly aimed at something, and I wanted the theme of the deck to be somewhat original, O-Kagachi it was. Now, O-Kagachi is used by most as the commander of Spirit tribal for people that want to use all five colors, but as I said before, I was trying to be somewhat original here.

So, I focused on a specific part of his ability… The fact that he exiles. In fact, he’s the only five-colored commander that exiles anything, and as such is the better suited for an exile-focused deck. From there, my mind leaped to some very specific exile cards, the processors from Battle for Zendikar, bringing back exiled cards of your opponent’s to get effects. Around them, the deck grew a colorless/eldrazi/devoid subtheme, and has some really powerful interactions. A parallax wave with a processor is very powerful, and a parallax tide is just mean. In addition to that, our removal very largely exiles, which happens to shut down more than a few strategies and graveyard shenanigans from our opponents.

Overall, the deck is not the most powerful thing out there by far, but it is very unique and I have never seen anyone else using this deck. Every time I used it in a new playgroup I got asked questions about what exactly was that? Now, for a few specific elements…

The Manabase and fixing
A five color deck using no staples still needs a manabase that allows it to actually cast spells. Due to our restrictions, this was particularly rough. We have more lands, more ramp, more card draw, and some dedicated mana fixing slots to help us get there. For nonbasics, we trade a lot of speed for consistency. We’re playing the old Lairs, all the variants of shimmering grotto and the slow fetches to allow us some kind of fixing in the manabase… And talking about those… Let’s talk about the exceptions.

The ‘Staples’ that slipped through
You know what? Building a deck from scraps lying around is hard. And I am a dirty cheater. This deck is playing some Staples (your definition may vary). It is playing the Amonkhet Cycle of Bi-Cycle lands because it really, really needs typed duals to be somewhat consistent thanks to the slow fetches and the typed-searching fixing. It is playing Grand Coliseum despite it being fairly played, and the slow fetches themself see play in more than one deck.

It is also true that Ashiok, Sire of Stagnation and Oblivion Sower see play in a lot of decks, but they fit the theme to a t, are very good and still aren’t anywhere near what I would call ‘staples’. There’s a few other cards that see some play in a deck or another, but I don’t think I’ve betrayed the spirit of the building exercise.

Winning
Winning is slow and definitely not a given. There’s no dedicated combo to win the game or particularly powerful win-con. Never underestimate O-Kagachi, as a 6/6 flying trampler can and will sneak in some commander damage as well as be a dissuasion tool for attacks. Despite its slowness, the manabase is surprisingly consistent, even though you’ll often be a turn behind the rest of the table as a price.

Tags

This deck appears to be legal in EDH / Commander.

Turn: Your life: Opponent's life: Poison counters:
Hand (0)
Library (0)
Graveyard (0)
Exile (0)
Board (0)

Name

Type

Notes

Power

Toughness

card

Type

Notes

Power

Toughness

 

Counters

Move this card to:

Actions

2-sided (coin flip)
6-sided (d6)
20-sided (d20)
Sides:

Auto-draw

Auto-untap

Double-click to open card details.

Move selected to:

Combined probability

Min. amount:
Card:

Custom calculation

If I play a card times in my ? card deck, how likely am I to draw it times?
  Name Hand Turn 1 Turn 2 Turn 3 Turn 4 Turn 5 Turn 6 Turn 7 Turn 8 Turn 9 Turn 10

Additional Probabilities

Embed Into Forums or Website

For forums and blogs please select one of the BB-Code options. For websites and forums that support HTML (e.g. Wizards Community Forums) you can use the HTML options.

Link to this deck

Here are some suggestions for cards you could add to your deck, based on decks that other players have built with this Commander.

Please add some cards to the deck to see card suggestions.

Unfortunately, we could not detect a Commander in this deck. Please choose it here to view card suggestions. To make sure this deck is analyzed properly in the future, please flag your Commander in the deckbuilder or put it in a separate section called "Commander".
Score Card Name Type Mana Rarity Salt
Powered by edhrec.com
These are the all the revisions of this deck. Click on a revision to view the deck as it looked back then.
  Compare Revision Created By
» Revision 20 April 30, 2020 Niuttuc
Revision 19 April 30, 2020 Niuttuc
Revision 18 March 25, 2019 Niuttuc
Revision 17 March 25, 2019 Niuttuc
Revision 16 March 25, 2019 Niuttuc
Revision 15 September 15, 2018 Niuttuc
Revision 14 September 14, 2018 Niuttuc
Revision 13 September 14, 2018 Niuttuc
Revision 12 July 18, 2018 Niuttuc
Revision 11 July 18, 2018 Niuttuc
Revision 10 July 18, 2018 Niuttuc
Revision 9 July 18, 2018 Niuttuc
Revision 8 July 18, 2018 Niuttuc
Revision 7 July 18, 2018 Niuttuc
Revision 6 July 15, 2018 Niuttuc
Revision 5 July 15, 2018 Niuttuc
Revision 4 July 15, 2018 Niuttuc
Revision 3 July 15, 2018 Niuttuc
Revision 2 July 15, 2018 Niuttuc
Revision 1 July 15, 2018 Niuttuc
There are no comments about this deck yet.
English card names will be linked automatically.
In addition, you can use BBCode (like [b][/b], [url=...][/url] and so on) here.

An error with your login session occured:
unknown
You can do this in a different tab to avoid losing the data you entered here. Once you are done, click the Refresh Session button and then try again.
If the problem persists, please contact us.