Who needs Mana to win? - Comments

[Comment Bot]

Who needs Mana to win?

This topic has been created automatically to discuss this deck.
Dieses Thema wurde automatisch erstellt, um dieses Deck zu diskutieren.

[Soren841]

That's not cheerios..

[Soren841]

U need Puresteel Paladin

[DesolateVenom]

True, those aren't cheerios, they "were" until i added in some other artifacts; it was from my original edit.  Thank you for catching that!

[DesolateVenom]

I did actually look into Puresteel Paladin, but when playing the practice hands, getting the mana online for him proved cumbersome on most occasions. Also, most of the artifacts become mere fodder when playing with a full set of Salvage Titan s.

[DesolateVenom]

The card draw advantage from Puresteel Paladin is awesome, but most of this equipment will hit the field before he does.

[Soren841]

Cheerios has Puresteel Paladin, it's not cheerios without him, it's just affinity

[DesolateVenom]

What mana fix would you suggest then to allow easier casting for him then?

[DesolateVenom]

I have even considered Chromatic Lantern and Darksteel Ingot

[Soren841]

Myr

[Soren841]

Paradise Mantle

[Soren841]

Mox Opal

[ggtestament]

I think the biggest problem is card draw. You put out your hand really fast, but you have no way to replenish your hand. If opponent wipe the board, that would be a really big problem. Cheerios deck works only because Puresteel Paladin replenish your hand so you can play more cards

[ggtestament]

If Puresteel Paladin is too color intensive, Try Sram, it has 1 less white mana, so it might help

[apoapostolov]

Love the idea but the deck can be bricked by a single Vraska's Contempt or any other removal. It has super strong start but can be locked out of mid-game.