deckstats.net
You need to be logged in to do this.
The buttons above will open in a new window. Please return to this window after you have logged in. When you have logged in, click the Refresh Session button and then try again.

Author Topic: $20 Deck That Will Shame Their $250 Deck - Comments  (Read 11380 times)

Notchbeard

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 22
  • Karma: 1668
  • Carpe Diem
  • Decks
Re: Withering Infections: $20 Deck That Will Shame Their $250 Deck - Comments
« Reply #30 on: January 31, 2015, 03:32:32 am »
Artifacts like Cobbled wings etc is unnecessary, twelve of the creatures already have flying. I have alted Juggernaught in instead of Kulrath Knight a few times but he isn't as effective as Kulrath's Ability. Don't really need more infect, need more control which Kulrath provides.
The notchiest of beards.

fredix

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Karma: 1
  • Decks
Re: Withering Infections: $20 Deck That Will Shame Their $250 Deck - Comments
« Reply #31 on: February 20, 2015, 06:37:01 pm »
Im just curious, what do you change necroskitter for..guess some kulrath knight s..seems like in more expensive version there is  need for 4x phyrexian crusader, some skithiryx, the blight dragon, and in most expensive version also 4x inkmoth nexus...also what to play in sideboard (probably extirpate,    
Hero´s Downfall..) great idea, but seems to be very slow (kulrath for 5 mana and killable by -3/-3 or 3dmg cards, necroskitter just 3 mana, and 1/4, less control but also very strong ability..only the price)
« Last Edit: March 11, 2015, 08:59:42 pm by fredix »

Annomander84

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Karma: 6
  • Decks
If you would play this Deck on our Tournaments,... you will go home 0:5, This Deck does NOTHING that Twin, Tron, Hatebears,etc. can´t handle. Its slow and ineffective and defintetly not playable in Tournaments...

Virpe

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9
  • Karma: 10
  • Decks
What would be a good sideboard for this deck?

Laf67

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • Karma: 30
  • Decks
@Annonmander84 - Completely agree, the deck is miserable, has no answers or speed to match up to any sort of combo deck. The only thing I could see it handling is MAYBE some sort of cheap creature based midrange deck but even then.
"The soul of the world has returned"

FunkyGadjo

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Karma: 0
  • Decks
Hey, I like your deck! I might go for something like this but I would like to have more cards as kulrath or crumbling ashes, abilities that trigger something on "marked" creatures or player. Any suggestion?
]

YamiYami

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
  • Karma: 13
  • Decks
Id like to try with modern burn deck

Drunk Cynic

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 680
  • Karma: 120
  • Abusing the Terrible and Neglected
  • Decks
Why is this turd sandwich so highly praised?
Perpetual Johnny. Interactions and originality are preferable to winning, though winning doesn't hurt.
If I throw statistics at you, they likely came from:
https://stattrek.com/online-calculator/hypergeometric.aspx

G. Moto

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3101
  • Karma: 472
  • Helping Planeswalkers one post at a time.
  • Decks
Re: $20 Deck That Will Shame Their $250 Deck - Comments
« Reply #38 on: August 14, 2015, 06:46:58 am »
Glad it worked out for you.If you need anything else shoot me a post.

Sagrit

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Karma: 1
  • Decks
Deck is amazing ! ) Testing it in MTGO now.
But i usualy have a problem with mana. Maybe there is a way to fix it with some special lands? Or just increase an amount of lands in deck?
Usualy have to mulligan many times, so i wil have 3 lands in starting hand.

G. Moto

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3101
  • Karma: 472
  • Helping Planeswalkers one post at a time.
  • Decks
Re: $20 Deck That Will Shame Their $250 Deck - Comments
« Reply #40 on: August 17, 2015, 03:00:05 pm »
That's good to hear. Skin renderer is always helpful in any type of black deck , and it's a zombie so you can get some good Innistrad zombie recursion going on if you have multiples.

musashi1113

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Karma: 1
  • Decks
Re: Withering Infections: $20 Deck That Will Shame Their $250 Deck - Comments
« Reply #41 on: September 18, 2015, 02:46:06 pm »
How about Viridian Longbow? So you can easy give -1-1-Markers to the opponents creatures and poison-markers to him.

G. Moto

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3101
  • Karma: 472
  • Helping Planeswalkers one post at a time.
  • Decks
Re: $20 Deck That Will Shame Their $250 Deck - Comments
« Reply #42 on: September 23, 2015, 07:25:06 am »
If mana is the problem then consider adding dual lands (but not too many, lest you slow down the deck and your reaction speeds). I encourage for a 60 card deck to have at least 24 lands. I run larger decks and account for my mana accordingly ( at least 1/3rd of the deck should be mana). Also evolving wild is a good land that lets you grab any basic land straight from your deck simply by sacrificing it.

Shznt84

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25
  • Karma: 11
  • Decks
Re: Withering Infections: $20 Deck That Will Shame Their $250 Deck - Comments
« Reply #43 on: October 09, 2015, 07:40:40 pm »
Using a similar deck that has Necroskitter.  Let me tell you, the first response I always get is "you have to be kidding me"

Shznt84

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25
  • Karma: 11
  • Decks
Re: Withering Infections: $20 Deck That Will Shame Their $250 Deck - Comments
« Reply #44 on: October 09, 2015, 10:17:35 pm »
Forgot to add Caress of Phyrexia as well.  Can be a game ender.