lol no worries! Yeah I guess there are different approaches to control. The safer side in one sense is using spells like you mentioned, which counter things without a doubt. On the other hand, there's the side which is more likely to be able to cast a
counterspell or two due to a lower cost, but with the downside that you might not have the right
counterspell at the right time. I tend to prefer the second approach, but that certainly doesn't invalidate the first! I guess part of why I lean that way is because I want to keep my mana curve low. Control decks often have higher ones, but I can't stand getting mana flooded, so I tend to err just slightly on the lower side. Maybe that's a bad design choice, I don't know.
I was thinking of adding some more copies of
Aeon Chronicler, but I'm not anticipating being able to use them (especially with my low mana curve) without
Jhoira of the Ghitu -- I actually substituted that copy for
The Magic Mirror. And with only four Jhoiras in the deck, it's going to be a dead card a lot of the time. So I'm thinking to use it once I've reached a good position, but not really before that.
Yeah, I'd stick better dual lands in there if I had them lol... I'm missing a few Izzet duals.
Yep! The way I originally built the deck (see revision 9) was a lot heavier on the suspending, and less so on the control aspects. Then I realized that to survive against most other decks long enough for the suspends to hit the board, I really needed better delaying tactics. That's when I moved four copies
Fury Charm and four copies of
Timecrafting out of the mainboard... But artifact removal is useful in the sideboard, and the multi-use like you said is helpful, so win-win! I think
Abrade is still a slightly better card even for this deck, but I only have one copy so it's hard to put in more.
I'd actually like to put in multiple copies of
Watcher for Tomorrow, because I think it works well!