Deckstats Forum

Other => Deck Comments => Thema gestartet von: Comment Bot am September 27, 2017, 02:43:42 Vormittag

Titel: Hydromancy - Comments
Beitrag von: Comment Bot am September 27, 2017, 02:43:42 Vormittag
Hydromancy (https://deckstats.net/decks/92987/817257-hydromancy)

(https://i.hbtronix.de/flags/usgb.png) This topic has been created automatically to discuss this deck.
(https://i.hbtronix.de/flags/de.png) Dieses Thema wurde automatisch erstellt, um dieses Deck zu diskutieren.
Titel: Re: Hydromancy - Comments
Beitrag von: THEpuy am September 27, 2017, 02:43:46 Vormittag
Liked because deck looks cool, then un-liked because trophy mage (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Trophy+Mage) has no target.
Titel: Re: Hydromancy - Comments
Beitrag von: RyujinSaotome am September 27, 2017, 03:08:43 Vormittag
Thanks for bringing that up. Fixing that issue now.
Titel: Re: Hydromancy - Comments
Beitrag von: RyujinSaotome am September 27, 2017, 03:15:13 Vormittag
There, now Trophy Mage (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Trophy+Mage) has a valid target, one which is actually also useful by giving +1/+1 counters when wizards enter the battlefield
Titel: Re: Hydromancy - Comments
Beitrag von: THEpuy am September 27, 2017, 05:15:34 Vormittag
It doesn't say 3 or less. It says 3. Try again :P
Titel: Re: Hydromancy - Comments
Beitrag von: RyujinSaotome am September 27, 2017, 06:30:41 Vormittag
There, NOW I have a CMC artifact of 3 lol. Better?
Titel: Re: Hydromancy - Comments
Beitrag von: Skâl am September 27, 2017, 04:02:54 Nachmittag
I think your deck doesn't works good, because you play many cards with high manacost. I would play 22 lands, maybe you can reduce some other stuff. I would cut Storm Sculptor (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=de&card=Storm+Sculptor) and Tempest Caller (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=de&card=Tempest+Caller). I would cut one Search for Azcanta (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=de&card=Search+for+Azcanta) too, because it's legendary and you finish with a 60 card deck :-P
Titel: Re: Hydromancy - Comments
Beitrag von: THEpuy am September 27, 2017, 05:47:08 Nachmittag
there you go
Titel: Re: Hydromancy - Comments
Beitrag von: RyujinSaotome am September 27, 2017, 10:35:58 Nachmittag
Thanks [thecrazymagicman].  And thank you for bringing those to my attention [Skal]. I'll adjust the deck some more :) Thank you for the suggestions everyone!
Titel: Re: Hydromancy - Comments
Beitrag von: RyujinSaotome am September 27, 2017, 10:41:26 Nachmittag
There, dropped 1 Search for Azcanta (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Search+for+Azcanta) and both Sorm Sculptor's for 2 more islands.  Seem better?
Titel: Re: Hydromancy - Comments
Beitrag von: RickSanchez am September 28, 2017, 03:51:04 Nachmittag
I would drop the wizard plan, means:
-2 Baral, Chief of Compliance (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=de&card=Baral%2C+Chief+of+Compliance)
-4 Nimble Obstructionist (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=de&card=Nimble+Obstructionist)
-4 SirenStormtamer
-2Tempest Caller

add
+4 Riddleform (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=de&card=Riddleform)
+4 Enigmadrake
maybe +4 Soul-Scar Mage (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=de&card=Soul-Scar+Mage)
and more red removal and more cantrips
Titel: Re: Hydromancy - Comments
Beitrag von: RyujinSaotome am September 28, 2017, 09:40:53 Nachmittag
Thanks for your advice [RickSanchez]. However, doing that would unfortunately defeat (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Defeat) the purpose of the deck, which is a focus on mono-blue wizards. However if I make a hybrid UR-wizard deck, I might take your suggestions into consideration for building it. I appreciate you giving me advice though :)
Titel: Re: Hydromancy - Comments
Beitrag von: Skâl am Oktober 21, 2017, 04:26:17 Nachmittag
Looks better, but i would really play 22 - 24 lands.