Deckstats Forum
Other => Deck Comments => Topic started by: Comment Bot on March 19, 2018, 08:19:05 pm
-
No more lands (https://deckstats.net/decks/72991/944968-no-more-lands)
(https://i.hbtronix.de/flags/usgb.png) This topic has been created automatically to discuss this deck.
(https://i.hbtronix.de/flags/de.png) Dieses Thema wurde automatisch erstellt, um dieses Deck zu diskutieren.
-
Love the deck idea! I feel like Smallpox (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Smallpox) would be a great addition though- you only need 2-3 lands to function effectively, and your land count means that you're always likely to draw enough to function. Smallpox (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Smallpox) also attacks your opponents hand, as well as their creatures (of which you only have one, which also happens to be recursive). I know it's a little expensive, but it's another 2 mana LD spell that could do some serious work for you! ^^
-
yeah but smallpox (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Smallpox) won't work if you have already used polling venom (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Venom) or rain of tears (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Rain+of+Tears). your oponent will sacrifice one of the enchanted lands and you would have wasted it.
-
@SalmonOfK84: I thought about Smallpox (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=it&card=Smallpox) (knowing it for using in my Pox (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=it&card=Pox) deck) but decided not to use it: I can't afford to use it in the first rounds, because I need all the mana I can produce to try to stop the opponent in the quickest way possible. :) But it could be an option for the sideboard (I have to think about it).
-
Amazing Job my friend!
-
I like it!