Deckstats Forum

Other => Deck Comments => Topic started by: Comment Bot on October 08, 2015, 04:12:14 am

Title: Eldrazi Assault Formation - Comments
Post by: Comment Bot on October 08, 2015, 04:12:14 am: This is the comment topic for Eldrazi Assault Formation (http://deckstats.net/decks/17101/330997-eldrazi-assault-formation).

Please use the Reply button to comment. If you do not have an account yet, please use the link on top to register.

Dies ist das Kommentarthema für Eldrazi Assault Formation (http://deckstats.net/decks/17101/330997-eldrazi-assault-formation).

Bitte benutze den Knopf "Reply", um einen Kommentar zu schreiben. Wenn du noch kein Benutzerkonto hier hast, benutze bitte den Link "Register" (oben) um dich zu registrieren.
Title: Re: Eldrazi Assault Formation - Comments
Post by: Sedat3D on October 08, 2015, 04:12:14 am: Really stupid, get rid of assault formation (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Assault+Formation) and the whole deck is dead (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Dead). You want a more versatile deck that doesn't depend on one enchantment. Use Vile aggregate (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Vile+Aggregate), mist intruder (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Mist+Intruder) for flying and Herald of Kozilek (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Herald+of+Kozilek) rather than using black for this deck. It will open more possibilities to adapt if assault formation (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Assault+Formation) is taken out of the equation. Trust me, I have been building eldrazi decks for 5 years, and I have made every build you can think of. Not saying Assault Formation (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Assault+Formation) is bad, just saying throw some guys in that can still do something even if it is not on the field.
Title: Re: Eldrazi Assault Formation - Comments
Post by: RaquelRosa123 on October 08, 2015, 04:35:52 am: fake

(im gay)
Title: Re: Eldrazi Assault Formation - Comments
Post by: tonyxp on October 09, 2015, 08:55:58 am: thanks i will try
Title: Re: Eldrazi Assault Formation - Comments
Post by: Keenom on October 10, 2015, 08:08:24 am: I totally agree with the first guy. its not a bad deck but it relies to heavily for assault formation (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Assault+Formation)
Title: Re: Eldrazi Assault Formation - Comments
Post by: itscraigwells on October 16, 2015, 06:20:21 pm: great idea i love the skimmers, sedat give him some credit jesus. it does need assult formation (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Formation) though, and you dont have anything that lets you grab it or extra cards.
Title: Re: Eldrazi Assault Formation - Comments
Post by: ALE909 on October 21, 2015, 01:15:38 pm: It is not stupid. It's a great deck.
One must know how to use it. That only achieve a great player.
We must stand with the advocates to make the spell and clean the table.

Learn to play and then criticize.
Title: Re: Eldrazi Assault Formation - Comments
Post by: Yuto Kigai on October 27, 2015, 12:26:07 pm: I dont know so many liked it. It has no fetches or something to make it faster.
Title: Re: Eldrazi Assault Formation - Comments
Post by: hgghy on November 01, 2015, 03:17:37 am: maybe dark petition (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Dark+Petition)?
Title: Re: Eldrazi Assault Formation - Comments
Post by: LordPine on November 05, 2015, 07:56:57 pm: It's a good deck concept, the large defenders are hard to deal with early game however alot relies on Assault Formation (http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Assault+Formation). In a real competitive tournament it would be hard to see this deck go very far.
Title: Re: Eldrazi Assault Formation - Comments
Post by: Kalonian Eldrazi on March 03, 2021, 08:04:47 pm: Hey, nice deck at real!