Deckstats Forum
English-language Forums => About Deckstats => Deckstats Feedback => Topic started by: Morganator 2.0 on June 23, 2019, 06:16:09 pm
-
We have two new moderators, and the forums are more active than they've ever been. Time to make some changes. If anybody has any suggestions on improving this site, let's hear it. Anything at all.
I'll start.
I know one thing I've heard a lot of complaints about is the look of Deckstats. Not so much the forum layout, but more-so the spoilers for cards.
(https://i.imgur.com/ZjFlQj7.jpg)
You can see that some of the cards are cropped, and some of them aren't. Some cards also have the text blurred out. It also seems to be like this for newer cards but not older cards. It's possible that this could be fixed by taking the images from Scryfall instead of mtg-forum.de
-
I would like to be able to fit more quotes of people saying I'm awesome in my signature line. The main problem I have is that the BBC code for quoting someone counts a lot toward that limit. Is there a way no not count that stuff?
Okay so for example:
{quote}
Hello world
{/quote}
Takes up 29 characters, but it would be great if it only counted the characters in Hello world.
-
My suggestion would be able to see the visual images of upcoming sets. For example, in addition to the list of cards coming out in say M20 to have the option to see the image of the card. For the ones without an image already uploaded, to have an unknown image with its ability if it has one. Perhaps a visual tab for the sets as an option
-
I'd like if you could put like a card price tracker (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Tracker) with charts showing price trends.
-
I'd like if you could put like a card price tracker (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Tracker) with charts showing price trends.
This seems like a little much for a deck-building/forum site. MTGStocks (https://www.mtgstocks.com/) already exists.
-
Is this just for the forums or for the deckbuilder or both?
I have no issues with the forums, but I have a few suggestions for the deckbuilder:
The ability to filter cards by color identity, not just color. And to be able to filter multicolored cards by their actual colors, not just by that their multicolored, i.e. searching for only BW cards. on the flip side, being able to filter cards excluding a certain color, i.e., filter out cards with white and/or blue in their color/identity.
The ability to filter with more than just one set. Say I want to pull up all the shocks, or the checks. the first requires at least two sets (guilds and allegiance), same with the other (dom and ixalan).
The ability to filter with keywords. i.e., contains "exile (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Exile) target creature" (exact phrase), or contains the words "whenever enters battlefield."
The ability to filter supertypes and subtypes. i.e., able to search only creatures that are Legendary and have the Warrior subtype.
that's all I have on the top of my head for now.
-
You can do all of that except the filter by multiple sets.
-
Well then I'm dumb and can't figure it out
-
I'll upload screenshots when I get on my PC.
-
You can just type words into the search bar and it'll search cards with those words. It just filters the cards with those words in their NAMES to be first. For example if you search "destroy," it'll find all the cards with the word destroy in their name, put them first, and then filter all the cards with the word destroy in their text after those.
-
Hi,
would it be possible to add more keyboard shortcuts while working with collections?
- to focus on the Search card input field (I need to use mouse to refocus (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Refocus), which is a bit annoying)
- to show the edition selection for the last added card to the collection
- to add +1/-1 to the last added card (I know, enter works, but not when the focus is lost).
-
This is a very small thing and I'm not sure if I just can't figure it out.
When I used to post a deck on the forum, it would categorize the cards on the forum how I told the deckbuilder to categorize them (I.e. color, card type, ext...). Now when I post a deck to the forum, I doesn't categorize the cards in the deck at all.
I just find this kind of irritating because I find it overwhelming to look at a decklist and have to categorize the threats, lands, spells and stuff in my head.
-
I would like to search for decks that only contain cards currently allowed.
It would be enough if i can limit it to decks that only contain cards of certain expansions
-
Love the site so far. Two suggestions I thought of.
1. Feature for subsections on the maybe board. I want to categorize my maybe board and allow others to see the thought process behind the maybe board.
2. When building the deck, allow column customization. An example is that I build a lot of budget decks, so I would love to see the price column right in my deck building to help me decide if one card is worth the extra money vs another.
-
Hi,
No need to say I love the website and I sincerily think you guys are doing a great job.
Nonetheless, I have 3 feature requests:
- I've noticed the stats for mana sources are quite inaccurate.
For instance, in this deck:
https://deckstats.net/decks/54477/531750-durdle-deck
The stats clearly say I only have 1 any-color land (Command Tower (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Command+Tower)), which isn't true since Reflecting Pool (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Reflecting+Pool) can produce mana of any color too (at least virtually).
Also, I play 4 fetchlands that can all grab Overgrown Tomb (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Overgrown+Tomb) and Prismatic Vista (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Prismatic+Vista) that can grab either a Swamp (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Swamp) or a Forest (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Forest), but they don't seem to participate to the statistics.
Moreover, I suspect Phyrexian Tower (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Phyrexian+Tower) counts as a double-black mana producing land, which isn't that true since I'd rather count that ability as a sac outlet.
Now, you can agree or not to what I've just said, what I actually request is a tag to manually set the mana produced by lands (like the <cost=CC> to set the casting cost).
I put this first because I heavily rely on the stats when deckbuilding (especially for EDH) and I find this issue quite misleading. - I'd like to be able to format the text in the deck description (using BBCode, HTML, RTF, you choose), for instance like in tappedout.net.
This could be very useful if people ever want to write some kind of primer about their deck or such, and I think it will benefit the website in general. - I'm a sofware engineer and the thing I like the most of the website is the version control of the decks.
I often use the compare tool to see the changes between two versions of the same deck, or to compare similar decks.
Most of the times, I find it quite cumbersome to read and not that descriptive.
I use extensively the manual deckbuilder, so I really miss something like Beyond Compare or any diff tool for programmers.
Here's a screenshot to have a visual idea of what I mean:
(https://i.stack.imgur.com/soFmh.jpg)
I understand though that this feature ain't probably that trivial to implement, and that's why I put it last.
As a side note, I'm Italian and I've noticed throughout the website that some translations to my language are incorrect or missing.
For instance, in the deck page, the tab "Details" is not translated and the tab "Charts" is rendered as "Classifiche", which is clearly incorrect.
"Classifiche" means "Charts" when talking about music charts and stuff like that, here the correct translation would be: "Statistiche".
I could volunteer to fill the gaps if you tell me how to do that.
-
When I print out text proxies of 2 faced cards or cards with a lot of text, it will just continue printing the text over the text of the card beneath it. For 1 sided cards with a lot of text, I would like for the font to automatically shrink (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Shrink) to fit the borders of the card. For 2 sided cards, I would like a toggle for printing the back face, or the back face printed on a separate sheet of paper, so I can cut both sides out and stick them into 1 sleeve. The way it is set up now is messy and hard to understand (no offense). Thanks!
-
I'd like to be able to format the text in the deck description (using BBCode, HTML, RTF, you choose), for instance like in tappedout.net.
This could be very useful if people ever want to write some kind of primer about their deck or such, and I think it will benefit the website in general.
Deckstats does use BBCode, although I've noticed that the buttons at the top don't always work, so I've had to resort to manually typing out the BBCode.
-
I'd like to be able to format the text in the deck description (using BBCode, HTML, RTF, you choose), for instance like in tappedout.net.
This could be very useful if people ever want to write some kind of primer about their deck or such, and I think it will benefit the website in general.
Deckstats does use BBCode, although I've noticed that the buttons at the top don't always work, so I've had to resort to manually typing out the BBCode.
I'm not talking about the forum, I'm talking about de deck description in the "Overview" tab of the deck page.
In the deck description, BBCode doesn't work, HTML doesn't work. The deck description is text-only, I've checked.
-
I can't find the 'new topic button, but I think this topic suits as well.
I can't find decks with Kethis, the hidden hand (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Kethis%2C+the+Hidden+Hand) as a commander via the search function. I wanted to find other elves legend decks with him as a commander but the results are empty: https://deckstats.net/decks/search/?lng=en&search_title=&search_format=10&search_season=0&search_cards_commander%5B%5D=Kethis%2C+the+Hidden+Hand&search_price_min=&search_price_max=&search_number_cards_main=&search_number_cards_sideboard=&search_cards%5B%5D=&search_tags=&search_age_max_days=0&search_age_max_days_custom=&search_order=updated%2Cdesc&utf8=%E2%9C%94
-
I can't find the 'new topic button, but I think this topic suits as well.
I can't find decks with Kethis, the hidden hand (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Kethis%2C+the+Hidden+Hand) as a commander via the search function. I wanted to find other elves legend decks with him as a commander but the results are empty: https://deckstats.net/decks/search/?lng=en&search_title=&search_format=10&search_season=0&search_cards_commander%5B%5D=Kethis%2C+the+Hidden+Hand&search_price_min=&search_price_max=&search_number_cards_main=&search_number_cards_sideboard=&search_cards%5B%5D=&search_tags=&search_age_max_days=0&search_age_max_days_custom=&search_order=updated%2Cdesc&utf8=%E2%9C%94
I can confirm the problem. With Kenthis as commander, nothing's found. If I just search for EDH Decks with "Kenthis" in title, I'll find some. Maybe caused by the comma in the name?
-
so I'm not sure what any suggested so far but things I think would be great just for deck building itself.
Search Page:
1. Removing everything on the left side of the page besides the Search Box. Direct Entry Box and Intro to Our Deckbuilder box. (allows for more cards on the page)
2. Making it so that thumbnails pop up and you can hover over to see a bigger picture if you want.
3. Possibly moving the Navigation Bar to the bottom of the page. Again helping fit More on the page for search and building features
4. Right side of the page could be narrower so that you can make the left side bigger a bit, since the left side doesn't need all the images and is only text
honestly you guys are the closest thing to amazing for Deckbuilding. I love your interface and setup more than any other one I've used. These are just the few things I would love to see personally .
Keep up the good work, your stuff is awesome.
-
When viewing a deck, be able to put things to a cart from a company that is not US based such as ChaosCards for the UK.
-
I can't find the 'new topic button, but I think this topic suits as well.
I can't find decks with Kethis, the hidden hand (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Kethis%2C+the+Hidden+Hand) as a commander via the search function. I wanted to find other elves legend decks with him as a commander but the results are empty: https://deckstats.net/decks/search/?lng=en&search_title=&search_format=10&search_season=0&search_cards_commander%5B%5D=Kethis%2C+the+Hidden+Hand&search_price_min=&search_price_max=&search_number_cards_main=&search_number_cards_sideboard=&search_cards%5B%5D=&search_tags=&search_age_max_days=0&search_age_max_days_custom=&search_order=updated%2Cdesc&utf8=%E2%9C%94
I can confirm the problem. With Kenthis as commander, nothing's found. If I just search for EDH Decks with "Kenthis" in title, I'll find some. Maybe caused by the comma in the name?
I still can't find decks with Kethis as commander. I would like to make a topic about this, but I can't make topics (at least not in this forum) as far as i know. So feedback is that it's impossible to create a topic to report a bug.
-
Thank you for all your suggestions! I am going through all of these, but a few quick things to note:
@paulusdeboself, @Judaspriester: The issue you reported with searching for some commanders has now been fixed: https://deckstats.net/decks/search/?lng=en&search_title=&search_format=10&search_season=0&search_cards_commander%5B%5D=Kethis%2C+the+Hidden+Hand&search_price_min=&search_price_max=&search_number_cards_main=&search_number_cards_sideboard=&search_cards%5B%5D=&search_tags=&search_age_max_days=0&search_age_max_days_custom=&search_order=updated%2Cdesc&utf8=%E2%9C%94
@easyy: I have made a lot of changes to the new deckbuilder over the last week, which should cover some of the things you mentioned. Please give it another try now!
-
Thank you for all your suggestions! I am going through all of these, but a few quick things to note:
@paulusdeboself, @Judaspriester: The issue you reported with searching for some commanders has now been fixed: https://deckstats.net/decks/search/?lng=en&search_title=&search_format=10&search_season=0&search_cards_commander%5B%5D=Kethis%2C+the+Hidden+Hand&search_price_min=&search_price_max=&search_number_cards_main=&search_number_cards_sideboard=&search_cards%5B%5D=&search_tags=&search_age_max_days=0&search_age_max_days_custom=&search_order=updated%2Cdesc&utf8=%E2%9C%94
@easyy: I have made a lot of changes to the new deckbuilder over the last week, which should cover some of the things you mentioned. Please give it another try now!
Thanks!
-
@crimsonking: Thank you for all your great suggestions. I have now implemented the first one, allowing you to override (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Override) which cards are counted as mana sources. Use source=XXX, where XXX can be any combination of mana symbols or * or {ANY} for any color. So for example you could set source=* for Reflecting Pool (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Reflecting+Pool) and source=C for Phyrexian Tower (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Phyrexian+Tower).
-
@crimsonking: Thank you for all your great suggestions. I have now implemented the first one, allowing you to override (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Override) which cards are counted as mana sources. Use source=XXX, where XXX can be any combination of mana symbols or * or {ANY} for any color. So for example you could set source=* for Reflecting Pool (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Reflecting+Pool) and source=C for Phyrexian Tower (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Phyrexian+Tower).
Thank you! :)
-
One quick question: how do I force a land to not to produce mana (like Maze of Ith (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Maze+of+Ith))?
This has come to my mind because I realized I shouldn't count Cabal Coffers (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Cabal+Coffers) as a mana source.
-
"source=" should work!
-
As a side note, I've noticed that - unlike Reflecting Pool (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Reflecting+Pool) - Exotic Orchard (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Exotic+Orchard) does count as "any color".
I came to the conclusion that's because Reflecting Pool (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Reflecting+Pool) says "any type" instead of "any color" (that's because this way it can produce colorless mana too).
There are many cards with the same wording, Plaza of Harmony (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Plaza+of+Harmony) is among them and I suspect it has the same problem.
Don't know how much this is a bug or a feature, but I think the criteria used to determine "any color" lands should be extended.
-
Thank you for pointing this out. To be honest, I am not entirely sure how we should handle these types of cards. We could count all of them as "any" but then that is also not entirely correct. However, I think it's probably the simplest if I do that and then rely on people to use override (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Override) <source=X (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=X)> option if they think this is not appropriate.
-
I think if Exotic Orchard (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Exotic+Orchard) counts as an "any-color" land, Reflecting Pool (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Reflecting+Pool) should count as well. One would expect that.
-
I have just made a whole bunch of changes to our "mana source detector"! It should now handle the edge cases you mentioned properly and also recognize fetch lands. Please give it a try and let me know what you think.
-
So, here are my considerations:
- Murmuring Bosk (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Murmuring+Bosk) is considered as monogreen.
- Crucible of the Spirit Dragon (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Crucible+of+the+Spirit+Dragon) and Cascading Cataracts (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Cascading+Cataracts) are considered as colorless lands.
- Rhystic Cave (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Rhystic+Cave) and Meteor Crater (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Meteor+Crater) are considered as non-mana-producing lands.
- Lands that don't produce mana are listed as "unknown". You can put as many as you want, the statistics will only count 1 unknown source.
- If you put for instance a Swamp (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Swamp) and a Maze of Ith (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Maze+of+Ith), the statistics will count 1 black mana source, but if you swap the Swamp (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Swamp) for a Wastes (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Wastes) it will count 1 colorless and 1 unknown. Of course, if you add Vesuva (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Vesuva) too, the unknown mana source will still be 1. I think this "unknown" category shouldn't exist at all.
- Urza's Mine (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Urza%27s+Mine), Urza's Power Plant (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Urza%27s+Power+Plant) and Urza's Tower (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Urza%27s+Tower) are considered to produce 3, 3 and 4 colorless mana respectively. Although I understand how the algorithm gets to this result, I think it is totally misleading.
- Crystal Vein (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Crystal+Vein) too is considered to produce 3 mana. Compare it with Ancient Tomb (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Ancient+Tomb) and you'll see how this is wrong.
- Cards like Ebon Stronghold (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Ebon+Stronghold) are considered to produce 3 mana. People tend to overlook colorless mana, but say you put an Ebon Stronghold (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Ebon+Stronghold) and a Mountain (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Mountain), the statistics will say 75% of your mana base is black, which is clearly false.
- Cards like Twilight Mire (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Twilight+Mire) count as 7 mana: 3 black, 3 green and 1 colorless, although we all know it nets you only 1 mana.
- Lake of the Dead (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Lake+of+the+Dead) is considered to produce a wooping 5 black mana! Although I wouldn't consider an error to list it as a 4-mana land, I think we could assume multiple mana come with drawbacks (that statistics are ignoring completely), so it would be more accurate to count lands at most once per color no matter what.
- If you put 1 Crumbling Necropolis (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Crumbling+Necropolis) and 1 City of Brass (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=City+of+Brass), the statistics will say you have 25% of blue, black, red and any-color each. I think the correct result should rather be 50% any-color and 16.67% of blue, black and red.
- According to the current system, Castle Sengir (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Castle+Sengir) is better than Crumbling Necropolis (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Crumbling+Necropolis), since it produce colorless mana too. Again, this is not strictly an error but it's weird to say the least.
-
As for the fetchlands, I actually think they should not count for mana statistics, at least not automatically.
I mean, I think the <source> tag is enough to allow the users to customize their mana-base evaluations.
Let me explain:
With the new algorithm, Verdant Catacombs (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Verdant+Catacombs) counts as Golgari while Prismatic Vista (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Prismatic+Vista) counts as an any-color land.
At first look this could be acceptable, but in fact it's false.
The problem is the fetchlands can grab duals while Prismatic Vista (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Prismatic+Vista) only gets basic lands.
For instance, everybody knows that in a tri-color deck, any in-color fetchland can get any dual, so they effectively count as any-color.
But if we're playing 5 colors things get more complicated.
Take this deck as an example:
https://deckstats.net/decks/54477/1203990-domain-cascade
Here Verdant Catacombs (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Verdant+Catacombs) can grab any dual, so it could count as an any-color.
The same is true for the other fetchlands aside from Scalding Tarn (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Scalding+Tarn). In fact, Scalding Tarn (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Scalding+Tarn) can't get white mana.
No need to say here Prismatic Vista (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Prismatic+Vista) would be terrible since it could only grab a Forest (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Forest) or a Swamp (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Swamp).
Fetchlands are very dependant on the decklist structure, that's why I'd let them out of automatic calculations.
-
Hi again,
Now that I was thinking of it, I'd have another suggestion for a quick improvement.
In the "Revisions" tab of the deck page, please put the "Compare Revisions" button on top.
I have many decks with 50 or more revisions and each time I want to see the changes I've made, I have to scroll down for a while only to reach the button.
After all, most of times you're interested in the last changes (so everything is already set up, you just need to click the button) or in the most recent ones (which are visible on top of the page anyway), so the scrolling down is unnecessary.
Moreover, why not just compare the last two last revisions straight away and leave the option to change them later (for instance through an expandable box)?
-
Thank you very much for your detailed analysis crimsonking! I have gone through and fixed some of the more obvious bugs you found, such as Urza's Mine (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Urza%27s+Mine) counting as three mana (it's now counted as two), Murmuring Bosk (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Murmuring+Bosk) only being counted as green, and mana being wrongly added together for cards like Ebon Stronghold (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Ebon+Stronghold) and Crystal Vein (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Crystal+Vein).
However, there are still some more edge cases that will require some additional coding/thinking.
I actually used to calculate the mean numbers for each land, accounting for the different mana each land could produce. So for example Ebon Stronghold (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Ebon+Stronghold) would be 1/2 + 2/2 = 1.5 black and Twilight Mire (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Twilight+Mire) would be 1/7 colorless, 3/7 black and 3/7 green. However I ended up changing that because it also seemed to lead to even more confusion.
I do agree that the way we are counting things right now is also not 100% right though. Will need to look into this some more.
-
PS: I have just moved up the compare revisions button, good suggestion!
-
In my opinion, the algorithm should be more or less (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=More+or+Less) like this:
- Each mana-producing land counts as 1.
(This could be considered inaccurate for lands like Ancient Tomb (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Ancient+Tomb), City of Traitors (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=City+of+Traitors) and Mishra's Workshop (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Mishra%27s+Workshop), but in the vast majority of cases I think it's a good approximation.
Bounce lands too produce 2 mana, but this is compensated by the fact that they put you back one land drop.) - Non-mana-producing lands are ignored.
(No more unknown mana sources in the statistics.) - Lands that say: "any color" or "any type" are considered any-color lands.
(Any-color is a color, exactly as black, blue etc.).
- Colorless is a color too.
- If a land has n mana abilities, each of them will participate for 1/n of the total for that land.
(For instance: Nimbus Maze (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Nimbus+Maze) will count for 1/3 as colorless, for 1/3 as white and for 1/3 as blue.) - If a mana ability says: "add {A} or {B}", it counts as two separated abilities: "add {A}" and "add {B}".
(For instance: Underground River (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Underground+River) will count for 1/3 as colorless, 1/3 as blue and 1/3 as black.)
Some more examples to better explain my idea:
- Murmuring Bosk (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Murmuring+Bosk) will count for 1/3 as green, for 1/3 as white and for 1/3 as black.
- Golgari Rot Farm (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Golgari+Rot+Farm) will count for 1/2 as black for 1/2 as green (not ideal, but still acceptable).
- Everglades (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Everglades) will count for 1/2 as black for 1/2 as colorless (same as above).
- Bottomless Vault (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Bottomless+Vault) will count as 1 black (namely, every storage land will count as 1 mana).
- Moreover, Crucible of the Spirit Dragon (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Crucible+of+the+Spirit+Dragon) will count for 1/2 as colorless and for 1/2 as any color.
- Cascading Cataracts (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Cascading+Cataracts) will count for 1/2 as colorless and for 1/2 as WUBRG (not 1 colorless and 5 of the rest).
- Urza's Mine (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Urza%27s+Mine), Urza's Power Plant (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Urza%27s+Power+Plant) and Urza's Tower (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Urza%27s+Tower) will count as 1 colorless (1/2 colorless plus 1/2 colorless; after all, they produce 1 mana most of the times).
- Phyrexian Tower (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Phyrexian+Tower) will count for 1/2 as colorless and for 1/2 as black (it could be 1/3 and 2/3 but I don't think it's that relevant).
- Sulfur Vent (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Sulfur+Vent) will count for 1/2 as black and for 1/2 as blue-red, i.e. 1/4 as blue and 1/4 as red.
- If I put 1 Ebon Stronghold (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Ebon+Stronghold) and 1 Mountain (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Mountain), the result should be 50% black and 50% red.
- Twilight Mire (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Twilight+Mire) will count for 1/4 as colorless and for 3/4 as black, black-green and green, i.e. for 1/4 as colorless, for 3/8 as black and for 3/8 as green (actually, I think it should be 1/3, 1/3 and 1/3 but that's tricky to do).
- Crumbling Necropolis (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Crumbling+Necropolis) will count as blue, black and red for 1/3 each, while Castle Sengir (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Castle+Sengir) will count as colorless, blue, black and red for 1/4 each.
- City of Brass (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=City+of+Brass) will count as 1 any color, while Spire of Industry (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Spire+of+Industry) will count for 1/2 as any color and for 1/2 as colorless.
- If I put 1 Crumbling Necropolis (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=Crumbling+Necropolis) and 1 City of Brass (https://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?utf8=1&lng=en&card=City+of+Brass), the result should be 50% any color, 16.7% blue, 16.7%black and , 16.7% red.
-
I was trying to filter by multiple sets, but perhaps I'm missing something. Would it be possible to add multi-set filtering, and if not, could a set be created that included rotation safe sets? Looks like there's a ton of set options to select, one called 2019 Rotation Safe Set, which include all cards from last four sets would be very nice. And then when Throne of Eldraine is released a new 2020 Rotation set could be started, and updated as next three sets are released. Or if not added as a set, perhaps as a format Standard-RS (Rotation Safe/Proof)?
Edit: NVM, I found it. Didn't notice a new box appeared after selecting (Enter Set Codes) form the set drop down list.