deckstats.net
You need to be logged in to do this.
The buttons above will open in a new window. Please return to this window after you have logged in. When you have logged in, click the Refresh Session button and then try again.

Informações do Perfil

Mostrar Mensagens

Esta secção permite-lhe ver todas as mensagens colocadas por este membro. De realçar que apenas pode ver as mensagens colocadas em zonas em que você tem acesso.


Mensagens - Blake

Páginas: [1] 2
2
Deck Comments / Re: Ruric Thar's Fight Club - Comments
« em: Maio 05, 2019, 07:06:36 am »



Revision 2

Added/removed cards due to price:
-1 Vengevine
+1 Rubblehulk

3
Deck Comments / Re: Front Toward Enemy (equipment) - Comments
« em: Julho 03, 2018, 07:55:59 am »
Also, since you're using Puresteel Paladin to negate equip costs, why not use Blackblade Reforged or Skinwing?

4
Deck Comments / Re: Front Toward Enemy (equipment) - Comments
« em: Julho 03, 2018, 07:35:08 am »
I like what you've done here, but I have a couple of notes:
For devotion, numeric mana symbols ({0}, {1}, and so on) in mana costs of permanents you control don't count toward your devotion to any color, so Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx would be dependent on only the white symbols of the creatures. That may have been the intention, and it does help mana ramp a little bit, but I just wanted to put that out there.
Lightning Greaves gives Shroud, which means you can't target the creatures either, meaning you've locked yourself out of adding more equipment to a creature wearing them. Try Swiftfoot Boots instead, because Hexproof > Shroud 99% of the time.

5
Deck Comments / Re: Valduk’s Atomic Arsenal - Comments
« em: Junho 26, 2018, 10:33:09 am »



Revision 2

Added/removed cards:
+1 (SB) Darksteel Plate
+1 (SB) Hammer of Nazahn
+1 (SB) Ring of Evos Isle
+1 (SB) Ring of Xathrid
+1 (SB) Shield of Kaldra
+1 (SB) The Brute
+1 (SB) Volcanic Strength

6
Deck Comments / Re: Ferocious Beasts and Where To Find Them - Comments
« em: Junho 26, 2018, 05:24:43 am »
This deck was wildly successful in the one game I used it, due to an early draw of Colossus of Akros. Deck revised to have a legal sideboard size - I plan to playtest more.


Revision 2

Added/removed cards:
-1 (SB) Boggart Brute
-1 (SB) Epic Confrontation
-1 (SB) Flamespeaker's Will
-1 (SB) Krasis Incubation
-1 (SB) Nivix Cyclops
-1 (SB) Pheres-Band Thunderhoof
-1 (SB) Reclaim
-1 (SB) Staunch-Hearted Warrior
-1 (SB) Traveler's Amulet
+1 (SB) Fall of the Hammer

7
Deck Comments / Re: Scry them to Death - Comments
« em: Novembro 08, 2017, 08:59:50 am »
I finally took some time to look over the deck and I think everyone who's commented so far can agree with at least one of the changes I've made.


Revision 3

Added/removed cards:
-2 Bolt of Keranos
-2 Glimmer of Genius
-2 Oracle's Insight
+3 Foresee
+4 Phantasmal Image
+3 Serum Visions
+3 Swiftfoot Boots
+3 (SB) Apostle's Blessing

Changed amounts:
-1 Calculated Dismissal
+2 Island
-1 (Main) +1 (SB) Keranos, God of Storms
-1 Knowledge and Power
+2 Magma Jet
-1 (Main) +1 (SB) Saheeli Rai
-2 (Main) +2 (SB) Sigiled Starfish
-2 (Main) +2 (SB) Spite of Mogis
-2 Swiftwater Cliffs
-1 Titan's Strength

8
Deck Comments / Re: Scry them to Death - Comments
« em: Novembro 08, 2017, 07:42:04 am »
"I was offering you advice on the deck you posted to the forums...for advice."
I think I found the root of our mutual misunderstanding, grollm. I didn't post this on the forum-side of Deckstats.net, because I wasn't actively seeking advice for the build. I think Deckstats.net just sends a copy of all decks posted within it to the forums as well. I think it also puts these comments in the forums. As far as I knew until now, all these comments have all been posted by going to the comments section of this deck (on the deckbuilder-side of the site, because this is the only side I post in).
Put plainly, this is the webpage I've been using. It's the comments tab on the deck: https://deckstats.net/decks/19763/847624-scry-them-to-death/en#deck_tabs-comments
Is this the page you've been using, grollm?: https://deckstats.net/forum/index.php/topic,32940.msg86744.html
I did see your threads in the forums offering advice, and I decided to reread all this again just to check to see if maybe I was being unreasonable. I do apologize for the misunderstanding, and I maybe wasn't faultless, but I stand by the core of what I've said here so far.
TL;DR: Sorry for seeming like I was being wishy-washy about wanting advice, deckstats.net went wonky on us both on this one.

9
Deck Comments / Re: Scry them to Death - Comments
« em: Novembro 08, 2017, 02:33:49 am »
"Why list it as modern instead of casual?"
It's listed as Modern because Modern Format was the constraint by which I picked cards to include in this deck concept. I usually use Modern as the filter when fiddling with deck ideas because I like the updated borders much more than the original borders. I know that Modern Format isn't necessarily a perfect fit for those needs, but the alternative is to look up exactly which set started the updated borders and then toggle each of the filter options to include that set and all sets chronologically after it. That, to me, seems too tedious since selecting "Modern" achieves the same basic goal. If my listing as "Modern" is really an issue, I suppose I'll consider changing it when I look at the cards suggested by marlonmikami - a task that I haven't dedicated myself to just yet. I'll get back to that idea in a bit, below.

"Scry shouldn't be a mechanic to drive a deck."
The deck is literally named "Scry them to Death." Using Scry as the centerpiece - the driver - is exactly what I built this for in the first place. If a prerequisite for a deck you want to look at is "it better not use scry as a driver," then why oh why did you come here, friend? lol

It's also worth note that I'm not done with this deck. I put it together in about 15 minutes. Even I personally think it needs more cheap burn spells to trigger Knowledge and Power more often while still allowing extra mana to activate it, and I've even considered including more cards to enter as copies of Flamespeaker Adept.
The truth is, no matter what I do, this deck may not (ever) stand against tribal Slivers or Goblins - it would be summarily destroyed by those strategies because there are simply stronger cards for those strategies. That doesn't mean Scry them to Death is a bad deck, it just means it shouldn't be played in that tier / against those decks. If anyone reads the list and believes they can take this to a tournament, they might have a bad time if they expect to win the #1 place, yes, depending on their competition. However, this deck is still Modern Legal and if someone wants to take a weird build, changed or not, to their next local Modern FNM, then I feel it's still important to list that this deck as capable of that.
My part is to come up with an idea, list it out, and post it. It's the reader's responsibility to decide if they think it's worth trying or not. I'm never going to force anyone to use this deck, it's just here if you want it. Personally, I think I'll see how it does because I think it sounds fun to play.

10
Deck Comments / Re: Scry them to Death - Comments
« em: Novembro 08, 2017, 12:58:25 am »
"Your deck is hot garbage! lolzroflamo"

"What? I was trying to help! I was obviously only trying to help! Your deck just really sucks!"

You drive a convincing argument, but I still don't see the part where you've offered anything useful, (apart from the first comment, where you suggested a consummate change of direction for the deck). My only logical assumption is that you must spend so much time staring at card statistics and metrics, sizing various mechanics and weighing them against each other, that you can't even conceive why someone would play this game purely for fun of it.

I'll give you another chance at redemption, though. If your intent truly is to help rather than to slander, what scry cards would fit better in this deck, given the cards I already have listed?

11
Deck Comments / Re: Scry them to Death - Comments
« em: Novembro 07, 2017, 07:29:29 pm »
It's my deck and I'm proud of it. Your opinion is your own, but I really don't appreciate this trolling. Please see yourself out the door if you can't contribute anything legitimate to the conversation.

12
Deck Comments / Re: Scry them to Death - Comments
« em: Novembro 07, 2017, 05:45:32 pm »
I have to disagree. If you find that your creatures are getting killed too quickly, you can use more countermagic.
If it weren't already abundantly clear, this deck was not made to be competitive on the pro tour, it's just here to showcase a weird strategy that is actually viable. If you judge decks only on how they'll perform in a tournament, by all means, go ahead, but I'm here for a fun time.
One man's hot garbage is another's casual treasure.

13
Deck Comments / Re: Scry them to Death - Comments
« em: Novembro 06, 2017, 07:21:02 pm »
Scry itself is useful.
Scrying three times in a turn before the attack for a 8/3 creature with CMC of 3 is even better.
Being able to spend mana in sets of 2 for as much damage to any creature or player is just icing on the cake.
If you really want prowess, go for it. This deck is made to scry them to death.

14
Deck Comments / Re: Scry them to Death - Comments
« em: Novembro 06, 2017, 05:01:02 pm »
I'll look into some of your advice, but Knowledge and Power is not the win condition, it's a tool to eliminate blockers. As far as many of those others go, every card needs to have scry on it so that the Flamespeaker Adept can get pumped up as much as possible, otherwise, I just don't think it works. Using scry also lets you dig through the library for more copies of Flamespeaker Adept. I will consider Kiln Fiend and Nivix Cyclops though, but the thing about this deck is it doesn't care as much about the count of instants/sorceries as much as it cares about using scry on every card available. It's the namesake, after all.
I do like Opt and Serum Visions, but I also already have plenty of low-cost cards. Still, they would make good sideboard. With Serum Visions, in particular, I really just wish it could scry before the draw, though in this deck I should have had another chance to scry before I used it anyway.
Thanks for the input though! I'll make some changes in a bit when I've really taken time to consider what you've said.

15
This deck was made before all the cards were actually in the gatherer, so yes that card was incorrect.

Revision 2

Added/removed cards:
-1 Dusk Legion Sky Walker
+1 Duskborne Skymarcher

Changed amounts:

Páginas: [1] 2