deckstats.net
You need to be logged in to do this.
The buttons above will open in a new window. Please return to this window after you have logged in. When you have logged in, click the Refresh Session button and then try again.

Mostrar Mensajes

Esta sección te permite ver todos los posts escritos por este usuario. Ten en cuenta que sólo puedes ver los posts escritos en zonas a las que tienes acceso en este momento.


Mensajes - Xhan

Páginas: [1]
1
Oh ok thx for your more constructive advices/feedback, i'll consider it if i rebuild or get new cards. And yeah i discovered this recently so im basically just updating my decks to have  an eye on them for building/Tc, it really helps. If you are interested in competitive modern deck check my UB Faeries or even maybe my genesisWave , two bigs underdogs.  If you are experienced in modern, i'd be glad to have your thoughts.

2
Hey buddy thx for your attention! At first I never meant this deck was for competitive play contrariwise i said it was almost constructed(innistrad), made i time ago and i only build deck from what i own. So this can be why the landbase feel inconsistent i know it.  It looks like you took it too seriously.
Or maybe you said that because it was not a 4of everything that i'v to admit feels theorically more consistent but in practice often more Sideable (my opinion) and for my pleasure of playing, i'd like to include many (even though its toomany) tech cards as 1of for the versatility and to avoid too much redundance in my play. Tell me if i didnt get your point, it'd be nice.

Finally i won enough game with it in my playgroup even against fair modern aggro deck to maintain that is still decent thx to his sexy low curve. ( at least in casual play)

Páginas: [1]