deckstats.net
You need to be logged in to do this.
The buttons above will open in a new window. Please return to this window after you have logged in. When you have logged in, click the Refresh Session button and then try again.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - DoubleBubble

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 13
31
Deck Comments / Re: Naya Landfall Zoo - Comments
« on: September 24, 2020, 09:11:40 pm »
and wheres wild nacatl? Its a 1 mana 3/3.

32
Deck Comments / Re: Naya Landfall Zoo - Comments
« on: September 24, 2020, 09:10:16 pm »
I dont think canyon Jerboa, scute swarm, or scythe cat are fast enough for modern zoo

33
Deck Comments / Re: Rouge Agrro - Comments
« on: September 20, 2020, 12:31:00 am »
*rogue

34
you have the total rite to post this deck, but this is not what should represent deckstats, and this is not what should be getting the whole sites attention.

35
And to be clear im not taking this out on u/TheEldraziPenguin (nice username btw), im taking this out on all the people wanting this on the front page and saying this deck is amazing and totally playable and should be on the front page of deckstats.

36
Thank you, and no thank you.

37
Why? Because after 2 years of being on this site, im tired of useless decks that will never be played or cared about anywhere making it to the front page while there are people out there methodically testing out different ingenious homebrews so that maybe a few people will see. The things people upvote on this site are just unplayable piles of garbage like this. Pretend you had a friend. Now pretend that friend shows up to your house wanting to play a game of casual magic with a multiple hundred card, multiple hundred thousand dollar deck. Well, every card is legal in causal, so if you (and who would) didnt want to play against an unplayable deck that wins on turn one every game, you would simply say: "even the four card rule applies in casual", which it does. You would be correct, and your only friend would be left to sell his absolutely useless multiple hundred thousand dollar deck. Why does anyone want these "decks" on deckstats? What purpose do they serve? None. And before you say "they're funny" or "they make me smile" or something like that, why? Do they make you smile because someone put it together just to squeeze a few likes out of gullible deckstats members? That sure doesnt make me smile.

38
Deck Comments / Re: Holy fuck this deck is fun - Comments
« on: September 11, 2020, 11:18:09 pm »
oops forgot to make this deck historic

39
Deck Comments / Re: Tempest Delver Tempo - Comments
« on: September 11, 2020, 03:39:44 am »
Finally! A modern deck on deckstats that doesnt suck is isnt just legal in standard/historic/pioneer :)

40
Deck Comments / Re: Best deck in ZNR standard - Comments
« on: September 10, 2020, 03:01:17 am »
oops! I keep forgetting m20 is rotating. I keep thinking its just the ravnica block. Editing the deck now...

41
Deck Comments / Re: Big Red - Comments
« on: September 07, 2020, 04:29:00 am »
IT 100% needs more lands though. Maybe like twice as many.

42
Deck Comments / Re: Big Red - Comments
« on: September 07, 2020, 04:27:55 am »
Interesting Idea with the Lotus! I might try to build off of it.

43
casual is anything as long as it follows the basic rules of magic. You still have to, for example, follow the mulligan rule. So why would the 4 card rule be any different?

45
Deck Comments / Re: Colossus Fires 2.0 - Comments
« on: September 06, 2020, 02:13:30 am »
ingenious.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 13