Messages

1

Deck Comments / Re: UR Baral and Kari Zev - Comments

« on: April 03, 2023, 01:21:18 pm »

- Act kann man machen, räumt aber halt den Commander auch ab
- dürft ganz ok sein, ja
- Ral ist halt rlatv fragil, geht aber auch
- ist gut ja
- hat ich mir überlegt aber ob man dafür Karten wegdelven möchte?
- 5 Mana ist schon ne Menge
- kann man machen
- sollt auch gut sein
- Frage ist ob die Karten allein nicht zu klobig sind
- von mir aus gern

2

Deck Comments / Re: URG Omnath, Locus of the Roil - Comments

« on: June 21, 2019, 11:49:44 am »

My spanisch is a bit rusty, but if  I understood correctly then yes, this is more of a lands list which wants the draw trigger with a few really good elementals and a small proliferate theme.

3

Deck Comments / Re: WBG Doran, the Siege Tower - Comments

« on: December 11, 2018, 12:52:12 pm »

Thanks for the comment!

Our house rules ban Sol Ring and Cyclonic Rift in addition to the official list.

You're definitely right about Meekstone. That was a bit of a budget omission since Crackdown provides a similar effect. Woulkd definitely add that one in for an optimal list though.

Orchard seems fine, but the deck runs quite a lot of double-colored-cost cards, so I'm not sure if one less tapped land is worth the risk of not being able to produce white or black.

Darksteel Mutation is a great card, could defintiely see running that over one of the more suboptimal removal choices.

Not the biggest fan of Mana Rocks in G-based decks because stuff like Bane of Progress is running wild in my playgroup. I'd consider adding Edge of Autumn for more consistent T2 landramp or Utopia Sprawl / Wild Growth for a T2 Doran first, if 37 lands turns out to be one too many.