deckstats.net
You need to be logged in to do this.
The buttons above will open in a new window. Please return to this window after you have logged in. When you have logged in, click the Refresh Session button and then try again.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - interfector

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8
1
Deck Reviews / Re: [Standard] Lich's Glorious Combo
« on: October 02, 2018, 08:37:55 pm »
With many deck playing Discovery // Dispersal it's very easy to die with a Lich's Master out...

2
uhm...

Cavern Harpy > Leonin Squire > Conjurer's Bauble

Cavern Harpy non può riprendere lo Squire... questa linea vuol dire qualcos'altro?

3
Questo succede solo se hanno lo stesso nome. Se uno é trasformato (quindi Adanto) e tu lanci Sbarco della Legione , non dovrai sacrificare niente. Se si trasforma anche il secondo (o il primo torna ad essere un incantesimo per qualche motivo) allora dovrai sacrificare uno dei due.

4
Deck Comments / Re: Pesca e muori - Comments
« on: March 07, 2018, 03:58:21 pm »
Avevo un mazzo così con colori RB, con Fate Unraveler e anche Reforge the Soul . Molto carino, ma contro controllo è molto difficile e inoltre non hai nemmeno una rimozione, con tutte le carte che l'avversario pescherà sarà complicato sopravvivere.

5
General Magic / Re: Dragon Tempest and Utvara Hellkite interaction?
« on: November 04, 2017, 02:21:56 pm »
The truth is that dragon tempest triggers twice but it does 3 and 4 damage respectively the first and the second trigger.

Why?

When dragons attack two Utvara triggers are on the stack. But they resolve separately, so resolve first and enters a dragon that trigger dragon tempest and The trigger is put on the stack and resolve before the  second Utvara trigger dealing 3 damage. Then the second Utvara trigger resolve, a new dragon enters triggering dragon tempest and dealing 4 damage.

So total damage 7!

6
Deck Comments / Re: A Scepter to Rule - Comments
« on: November 02, 2017, 12:27:34 am »
Probably, but not enough to be competitive :'( however I love this card and it's versatility.

7
Deck Comments / Re: Oops All Spells! - Comments
« on: October 31, 2017, 11:21:28 pm »
The problem of having only 2 Cabal Therapy is that 1 is needed for the combo (sac the cerberus), and sometimes you have to use it on yourself to discard combo pieces (dead return and cerberus).

I'm reconsidering my previous thought about Pact of Negation. Probably the split 2/2 with Chancellor of the Annex is a good thing. Why?

Chancellor is the best for turn 1 win, because you reveal it and also you can imprint it on Chrome Mox, so it fuel a win with protection. However if you can't win turn 1 and you wait for a turn 2 win it is not so good, your opponent can break the counter shield in his turn or have a land to tap for the tax.

Pact of Negation is not so good for turn 1 win because if you need to imprint it on Chrome Mox you give up the protection. But Pact can be useful after turn 1 when you probably have the mana.

So considered that an hand capable of winning turn 1 is very common and that force of will is very common, I think that a 2/2 split could be interesting. (need some testing and probabilities analysis)

8
Deck Comments / Re: Oops All Spells! - Comments
« on: October 31, 2017, 12:13:20 am »
From my tests it's not that unlikely to draw 2 Narcomoebas, but I have the Bridges only for that, so if you feel *lucky* you can cut them. I have made a change:
+1 Narcomoeba
-1 Bridge From Below

Considering the various configuration for cards in hand/library the split 4/1 probably it's the best (don't know why I thought 3/2 was better).

I had Pact of Negation in the main with a 2/2 split with Chancellor of the Annex, then i dropped the Pact 'cause they *can't* be imprinted on Chrome Mox.

But if you don't want to win turn 1, i recommend a 4-of Pact of Negation to survive the turn you need, and cutting the bauble it's a reasonable choice.

9
Deck Comments / Re: Oops All Spells! - Comments
« on: October 27, 2017, 11:51:39 am »
Yes, the goal is almost that but with some changes. In this version of the deck you Dread Return your Underworld Cerberus and then sacrifice it flashbacking Cabal Therapy. It dies and trigger his ability returning all creatures to your hand, so now you have some Elvish Spirit Guide (and Simian), one Wild Cantor, Laboratory Maniac and Street Wraith in hand. You add mana with the Spirit Guide, use Wild Cantor to filter to blue, cast Laboratory Maniac and win on the spot by drawing with Street Wraith.

Summoner's Pact is one of the mana accelerator because you can grab the Elvish Spirit Guide. However you can grab the Wild Cantor if you don't have Black mana sources. If you use Summoner's Pact be sure to win the turn you cast it (usually the first turn).

Bridge from Below is there because sometimes you draw some Narcomoeba and if you draw 2 of them, it's difficult to combo out with Undercity Informer. But with Bridges (1 or 2) you can Flashback Cabal Therapy and not lose any creature (to cast Dread Return) or effectively netting you a creature if you have 2 Bridges, so you can combo out with only 2 Narcomoeba.

Regarding your list, i think that Lotus Bloom is a very bad card for this deck. It is a mana accelerator but not of the kind we want it! We need fast mana to win the very first turn of the game, because we have no interaction with others decks and if we wait to win we can encounter graveyard hate or counters. So our goal is to win our very first turn of the game (on the draw it's very easy), i would cut the Lotus Bloom for other mana ramp like Rite of Flame or Seething Song (although we need Black mana).

10
Deck Comments / Re: Omniflux Ultimatum - Comments
« on: September 25, 2017, 03:04:37 pm »



Revision 3

Added/removed cards:
+1 Glittering Wish
-1 (SB) Coalition Victory
-1 (SB) Prismatic Omen
-1 (SB) Progenitus
+1 (SB) Bant Charm
+1 (SB) Destructive Revelry
+1 (SB) Learn from the Past
+1 (SB) River's Rebuke

Changed amounts:
-1 (Main) +1 (SB) Research // Development
+1 (SB) Jhoira of the Ghitu

11
Deck Comments / Re: Mill Blue/Black - Comments
« on: September 24, 2017, 09:39:58 pm »
Why not Glimpse the Unthinkable ? Some fetchland/shockland?

12
Deck Reviews / Re: [Legacy] Fluctuator Combo
« on: June 26, 2017, 01:09:55 am »
asd well i care a little about this *shitty* deck...

13
Deck Reviews / Re: [Legacy] Fluctuator Combo
« on: June 25, 2017, 09:53:01 pm »
The price of the deck? Very out of my budget but it's not of my concern. I don't want a budget version  of the deck but the possible best version of a deck.

14
Deck Reviews / Re: [Legacy] Fluctuator Combo
« on: June 25, 2017, 09:35:05 pm »
Yeah but it's like talking about a random storm deck and a pushed storm deck fully optimized. I know that the list you suggest "can" do it but I search to improve a list that do it better.

For example, with my list you can combo turn 1.

And protection =/= redundancy.

15
Deck Reviews / Re: [Legacy] Fluctuator Combo
« on: June 25, 2017, 08:48:43 pm »
You have to hit every land drop each turn to combo turn 3 without protection and/or any answer to anything with that setup. So not the best.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8