deckstats.net
You need to be logged in to do this.
The buttons above will open in a new window. Please return to this window after you have logged in. When you have logged in, click the Refresh Session button and then try again.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Ikarospharike

Pages: [1] 2
1
Deck Comments / Re: Storm Izzet - Comments
« on: October 24, 2019, 05:23:43 pm »
Not running shock lands? I think it'd help with your mana fixing. Tap/Scry lands may be too slow though. Also, how about one or two Ral, Storm Conduit? I understand if you think it'd screw with the minimum viable mana base too much though.
Against aggro it may need to side in a sweeper. I am interested in testing this deck though. Will let you know what I come up with when I tweak it.

2
Deck Comments / Re: Budget-ish Merfolk - Comments
« on: November 12, 2017, 12:10:14 pm »
Made changes as suggested. Sideboard suggestions anyone?

3
Deck Comments / Re: Budget-ish Merfolk - Comments
« on: November 11, 2017, 10:53:20 pm »
Thanks for the suggestions! When I get some time to go through it I'll change the list to suit.

4
Deck Comments / Re: Budget-ish Merfolk - Comments
« on: November 11, 2017, 08:30:26 pm »
What would I cut for it tho?

5
Deck Comments / Re: RB Discard Burn - Comments
« on: June 25, 2017, 06:26:22 pm »
I have had some pretty good success with it, although my local meta is pretty hard to play around. I managed a consistent top 8 finish with it on a few local unofficial tourneys.

6
Deck Comments / Re: RB Discard Burn - Comments
« on: May 30, 2017, 01:30:49 am »
Archfiend might not be a bad idea in grindy decks, but you ahve to remember he costs 5 to stick onto the field. By that time you really won't care about their creatures. He might make for a decent sideboard though, vs Aggro.
For Aggro maybe Flaying Tendrils is a better idea? Same ability and one less mana. I think there's also Rising Miasma that does the same and is 3B for the ability. Sweltering suns should probably also hit the sideboard as a 3-4 of. The Aggro matchup isn't bad, but it's not great either.

7
Deck Comments / Re: RB Discard Burn - Comments
« on: May 28, 2017, 01:42:40 am »
Thanks, I hadn't considered the Avacyn's judgement, but it might be slightly overcosted. You get three for 1 with temper, judgement might be strictly worse since it sucks up your excess mana to deal damage.

8
Deck Comments / Re: counter todo y mas - Comments
« on: February 03, 2017, 01:44:38 pm »
I built something like this, but I found Thing in the Ice is a bit too slow. Also, the deck gets hosed by Aggro. Might I suggest swapping out the Things in the ice? I Would say to drop in two Engulf the Shore and maybe two Aethertide Whales as finishers. Also, Baral's draw and discard ability is good if you have cards in hand. Glimmer alone might not be enough to keep your hand fueled. I'd advise dropping in two Pore over the Pages or Reverse Engineer. If you have a pair of the SOI Jace, his +1 ability ensures you always have a counter when you need it. Against mirror-match, sideboard like two overwhelming denials or summary dismissals. The dismissals are also good for when playing against Eldrazi that have the "When you Cast this Spell..." ability triggers since you only counter the resolution, not the ability. Disallow will counter the ability OR the activation, but not both. Summary Dismissal does both.

---

Construí algo como esto, pero encontré que Thing in the Ice es un poco demasiado lento. Además, la cubierta es hosed por Aggro. ¿Puedo sugerir intercambiar las Cosas en el hielo? Yo diría que caer en dos Engulf the Shore y quizás dos Aethertide Ballenas como terminadores. Además, la capacidad de Baral para tirar y descartar es buena si tienes cartas en la mano. Glimmer solo podría no ser suficiente para mantener su mano alimentada. Yo aconsejaría caer en dos Pore over the Pages o Reverse Engineer. Si tienes un par de Jace de SOI, su habilidad de +1 asegura que siempre tengas un contador cuando lo necesites. Contra el espejo-fósforo, aparador como dos negaciones abrumadoras o despidos sumarios. Los despidos también son buenos cuando juegas contra Eldrazi que tienen la habilidad de "Cuando lanzas este hechizo ...", ya que sólo contrarrestas la resolución, no la habilidad. La inhabilitación contrarrestará la habilidad O la activación, pero no ambas. Resumen El despido hace ambas cosas.

9
Deck Comments / Re: Paradoxical Outcome - Comments
« on: February 03, 2017, 12:48:09 pm »
Why not replace 2 anticipates for 2 Whir of Invention? You can then tutor up your Reservoir or Statuary as the case may be.

10
Deck Comments / Re: U Counterspells - Comments
« on: January 24, 2017, 11:47:44 pm »



Revision 3

Added/removed cards:
+3 (SB) Disperse
+4 (SB) Invasive Surgery
+4 (SB) Revolutionary Rebuff
+4 (SB) Spontaneous Mutation

Changed amounts:

12
Deck Comments / Re: Alternate WinCon - Comments
« on: January 24, 2017, 05:44:51 pm »
How do you exile the Hedron Alignment?

13
Deck Comments / Re: UB Hedron Alignment KLD - Comments
« on: January 17, 2017, 11:33:48 pm »



Revision 4

Added/removed cards:
-2 Ruinous Path
-4 Sinister Concoction
+3 Dispel
+3 Negate

Changed amounts:

14
Deck Comments / Re: UB Hedron Alignment KLD - Comments
« on: January 17, 2017, 11:30:05 pm »



Revision 2

Added/removed cards:
-4 Call the Bloodline
+4 Baral, Chief of Compliance

Changed amounts:

15
Deck Comments / Re: Fear of Thirteen - Comments
« on: July 29, 2016, 07:03:01 pm »
I really, really appreciate the feedback. I'm contemplating running this for game day, I don't think anyone in my local meta will be expecting it.

Pages: [1] 2