Messages

1

Deck Comments / Re: Ob Nixilis Dark Punishment - Comments

« on: April 05, 2022, 04:18:20 pm »

Wishclaw Talisman could be an interesting addition to this deck.

2

Deck Comments / Re: Aetherflux Artifact Deck - Comments

« on: May 30, 2020, 07:26:11 pm »

I get that this is supposed to be a budget vintage deck, but to be honest this deck will get destroyed by any other deck in the format. The reason Paradoxical Outcome is so good is because of its interaction with the moxes.  And as stated by khalitas, this deck colossally slow for this format, where decks can win in the first couple of turns.  I do however like the direction your were trying to take the deck in, but the idea of trying to create an ultra budget deck for a hyper-competitive format like vintage seems questionable.

3

Deck Comments / Re: Artifacts - Comments

« on: January 16, 2020, 12:34:00 am »

Why is there no Urza's Tower? There is literally no point in running the Mine and Power Plant without it.

4

Deck Comments / Re: Mono-Green Tron - Comments

« on: December 10, 2019, 11:25:08 pm »

Why so many singletons?

5

Deck Comments / Re: Lotus Amulet - Comments

« on: July 19, 2019, 01:50:00 am »

Revision 3

Added/removed cards:
-1 Ramunap Excavator
+1 Breeding Pool
+4 Forest
+1 Island
+4 Misty Rainforest
+3 Serum Visions
+1 Thespian's Stage
+3 Tireless Tracker
+3 Tranquil Thicket
+3 Verdant Catacombs
-1 (SB) Primal Command
+2 (SB) Ground Seal

Changed amounts:
-1 Crucible of Worlds
+1 Elvish Reclaimer
+2 Ghost Quarter
+1 Primeval Titan

6

Deck Comments / Re: Mardu Vehicles - Comments

« on: June 25, 2019, 03:29:23 am »

thecrazymagicman seems to be right on the money. My question is how will this deal with non-fair decks?

7

Deck Comments / Re: Mardu Vehicles - Comments

« on: June 24, 2019, 02:49:04 am »

It better have a lot of good removal  and then some to fight of the meta of T3 goldfish.