deckstats.net
You need to be logged in to do this.
The buttons above will open in a new window. Please return to this window after you have logged in. When you have logged in, click the Refresh Session button and then try again.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - TaZi

Pages: [1]
1
Deck Comments / Re: UB Reanimator - Comments
« on: June 29, 2022, 08:44:27 am »
why don't you play Liliana of the Veil?

3
Deck Comments / Re: Sultai Midrange - Comments
« on: November 22, 2020, 06:12:59 pm »



Revision 4

Added/removed cards:
-1 Dark Confidant
-1 Evasive Action
-1 Narset, Parter of Veils
-1 Sword of Feast and Famine
-1 Treasure Cruise
+1 Arbor Elf
+1 Courser of Kruphix
+1 Dismember
+1 Elvish Mystic
+1 Grim Flayer

cruise got banned
confidant has a too high variance in how much life he eats
I wanted to orient a bit more on early interaction (2 more elves, dismember, -narset, - sword)
I wanted to have some more green creatures that can defend a bit (courser, flayer)

4
Deck Comments / Re: Sultai Midrange - Comments
« on: November 22, 2020, 06:02:15 pm »
Ethereal Forager is a killer.
Questing Beast is quite nice, and I could imagine to add it.
Burn MU is good enough I guess. Uro (which you can tutor with quite some cards) will give them quite a hard time. And also you got plenty of disruption.
Thragtusk is definitely too expensive. Finks might be ok, if I had some room to spare =).

5
Deck Comments / Re: Sultai Midrange - Comments
« on: June 13, 2020, 12:56:31 pm »
any comments about the deck and individual card choices (or non-choices) are very welcome. And please ignore my previous comment. That was a copy paste accident.

6
Deck Comments / Re: Sultai Midrange - Comments
« on: June 13, 2020, 12:55:14 pm »
Sammelkartenmarkt

7
Deck Comments / Re: Ugr - Comments
« on: May 30, 2020, 01:00:21 pm »
Hi Paul,
nice that you started a detailed explanation. Before I start my detailed answer I understand that a lot of
these cards are really not super great but one lacks clearly better alternatives. Unfortunately I have not
yet put enough brainpower into it to propose alternatives (maybe I can add that in the future). Regarding
the cards discussed:

Bomat: I see that this card is nice in the case where you play it on turn one and it atks three times before
a power >2 sticks on the opps. side. The "cycle argument" is already diluted by the fact, that with quite
some counterspells in the deck you are not so often in pure topdeck mode where it is nice to cycle the card
right away. In turn, the card really sucks if your opp. sticks some random creature (e.g. turn 1 deathrite).
You also say in your decktech, that all creatures also have a relevance later in the game (which is a key
property for the deck to work I think). This however is often not the case with Bomat. I think I would really
replace him by some creature that has this impact.

Crop Rotation: The question for or against crop rotation is, how bad it is to burn cards. I would think that
when playing against a similar or only slightly slower tempo deck, it might be quite relevant to not throw
away cards. So this is in the end a metagame call (and also a question to which matchups might want some
improvements).

I have to play with traverse for myself before saying more about this card. Without this experience it looks
a bit clunky to me, but I might be mistaken there.

Tarfire: I think, that shock is not a card, I would play, because it just has too little of an impact.
(this also holds for all the alternatives you mentioned. They are either too shocklike or too slow (sinkhole)
of too unreliable (mogis)). Also having only 2 cards as a payoff (goyf and travers) is a bit too few in a
deck without tutors.

Ray of Erasure: I currently feel like "peek" would be a better replacement, because knowing the opps. hand
is quite helpful in this deck. Also it is a significant drawback, that you don't draw the card immediately.

Mirri: this is somehow similar to crop rotation for me. If it is necessary to avoid burning cards, one might
want to cut this, otherwise it's ok.

Mystic Sanctuary: I really have a problem with cipt lands in this deck and when you draw this in your
first 10 cards it will probably come into play tapped. But I agree, that it has nice synergies, when you
search for it.

Other stuff worth mentioning:
Gut Shot: does again too little for my taste.
Pyroblast: why no Red elemental blast?
Street Wraith: is it too bad?
Ash Barrens: ain't this a bit too expensive? What about city of brass/mana confluence?
Mana Leak: why no "evasive action"?

8
Deck Comments / Re: Ugr - Comments
« on: May 17, 2020, 09:38:44 am »
Hi Paul,
I really like the deck concept and I already convinced myself, that it plays nicely against Uxx midrange versions. Nevertheless I would question some of the shenannigans like, mystic sanctuary, travers the ulvenwald, crop rotation, bomat courier, mirri's guile, tarfire, ray of erasure. I tried mystic sanctuary in my sultai deck and was always unhappy with the "comes into play tapped" and that you never have 3 islands in play =) (you have currently 19 islands I think).

Best
TaZi

Pages: [1]