Messages

1

Deck Reviews / Legacy Thopter-Sword help

« on: August 16, 2013, 12:01:56 am »

Howdy, this is my first forum post. I would like some help on my legacy Thopter-Sword Deck. I want to keep it at $500 or less, but I will remove the dual lands to reduce price. Thanks!

LINK: http://deckstats.net/decks/3099/26785-legacy-thopter-sword/en

2

General Magic / Re: Who's your favorite Paneswalker of all time?

« on: May 21, 2013, 12:59:00 am »

Ahh... I love Tezzeret. Although Sarkhan the Mad was my first planeswalker, I appreciate Tezzeret more.

3

Deck Comments / Re: ELVES INFINITE FTW - Comments

« on: May 21, 2013, 12:56:32 am »

Please Comment! I love this deck type, and I am hoping that It will get some positive feedback.

4

Deck Comments / Re: Vorinclex Voice of Hunger EDH - Comments

« on: May 12, 2013, 11:34:33 pm »

NO PRIMEVAL TITAN

5

Deck Comments / Re: RWB Burn - Comments

« on: May 07, 2013, 04:33:35 am »

Comment Please!!! I love feedback.

6

Deck Comments / Re: RWB Burn - Comments

« on: May 07, 2013, 04:33:34 am »

Comment Please!!! I love feedback.

7

Deck Comments / Re: RWB Burn - Comments

« on: May 07, 2013, 04:33:33 am »

Comment Please!!! I love feedback.

8

Deck Comments / Re: Budget Hypergenesis (in progress) - Comments

« on: April 20, 2013, 02:44:56 am »

Tried to add a little ramping for T2 Cascades. I don't like it as much. I willl think of good replacements.

9

Deck Comments / Re: Karn EDH Deck - Comments

« on: April 19, 2013, 03:07:45 am »

Maybe add a Clockwork Gnomes...... It really helps with artifact creature regeneration. Something Like Darksteel Juggernaut would be pretty effective, too.

10

Deck Comments / Re: Budget Hypergenesis (in progress) - Comments

« on: April 19, 2013, 02:49:06 am »

Revision 15 - Vivid lands were not working in playtesting. Adding lands that can produce different colors is better. And it only increases deck cost by a little, which is good.

11

Deck Comments / Re: Budget Hypergenesis (in progress) - Comments

« on: April 19, 2013, 02:44:51 am »

@PatrickH - Okay, so the point is that everything is supposed to have a higher mana cost than Ardent Plea and Violent Outburst EXCEPT for Hypergenesis. Normally one would suspend Hypergenesis, but when I cascade for it, it comes into play immediately. This allows me to drop the huge creatures on turn 3 or 4 without paying their mana costs. Does this make sense?

12

Deck Comments / Re: Budget Hypergenesis (in progress) - Comments

« on: April 18, 2013, 03:19:01 am »

Revised it........... More Expensive. I like Pillar of the Paruns, but I am thinking of Cutting it and 1 Mirrodin's Core for 1 each of the vivid lands.

13

Deck Comments / Re: Budget Hypergenesis (in progress) - Comments

« on: April 18, 2013, 03:04:37 am »

Well, I changed it again, kept getting stuck with Caverns in 2nd or 3rd hand. Also, Changed Magister Sphinx count, Increased Sovereign.

14

Deck Comments / Re: Budget Hypergenesis (in progress) - Comments

« on: April 17, 2013, 03:39:07 am »

Added 2 More lands - I kept getting mana screwed in testing... Seems to be working better. I like that I also cheapened the deck.

15

Deck Comments / Re: Budget Hypergenesis (in progress) - Comments

« on: April 17, 2013, 03:32:48 am »

Update 10 - Spirit Guides superfluous. I kept lands at 18, but once again tweaked creature numbers.