Messages

1

Deck Reviews / Re: [Modern] Acid Destruction

« on: April 16, 2018, 01:16:21 am »

If you want pure ramp, the best gain-1-mana is Utopia Sprawl (although you need more forests), and the best gain-2-mana are Coalition Relic and Overgrowth (they are the ones that give you the most for the lowest price). Obviously, you can use creatures with similar effects (like Birds of Paradise and Joraga Treespeaker/Palladium Myr) but artifacts and enchantments are always harder to destroy.

However, I think those cards have little synergy with the rest of the deck... you can try Elvish Pioneer, but I think it would be better to remove the 6and7-cost cards (Nissa's Renewal, Soul of the Harvest, Verdant Sun's Avatar) and add some cards to defend yourself at the beginning (Wall of Omens!). In this way you would not need ramp and you would be more protected against aggressive decks.

I hope I've helped


P.S: Death Frenzy is too slow, I recommend Drown in Sorrow.

2

Deck Comments / Re: Sorin Tribal - Comments

« on: April 12, 2018, 10:08:34 pm »

From what I see, my Magic knowledge is seriously outdated XD Thanks for the clarification, zdrex007!

3

Deck Comments / Re: Sorin Tribal - Comments

« on: April 12, 2018, 08:06:34 pm »

Do you know that you can only have one Sorin planeswalker in the battlefield? For example, if you already have a Sorin, Solemn Visitor, you can not play a Sorin Markov

4

Deck Reviews / Re: [Modern] Help to improve this budget mono-black

« on: April 11, 2018, 04:40:08 pm »

Why do you have Shadowfeed? You can use Crypt Incursion or Consuming Vapors to gain life.

If you want more synergy, you can get more vampires: I recommend you Gatekeeper of Malakir (can replace Geth's Verdict) and Feast of Blood. For the late game, you could use Bloodlord of Vaasgoth, Drana, Kalastria Bloodchief or Anowon, the Ruin Sage (instead of Desecration Demon).

If your games are usually long, you might be interested in Scepter of Fugue.

5

[es] Solicitud de revisión de Mazos / [Modern] Mazo de control sin criaturas ni planeswalkers

« on: April 07, 2018, 05:17:03 pm »

¡Buenas! El caso es que llevo un tiempo queriendo montar un mazo de control basado en encantamientos, sin criaturas ni planeswalkers.

Después de varias versiones, creo que esta es la que mejor me ha salido:

https://deckstats.net/decks/51230/959789-peaceful-control-who-needs-act

Al final he no he metido tantos encantamientos como quería (he tenido que usar también bastantes artefactos, conjuros, etc...), pero estoy bastante satisfecho con el resultado.

¿Que os parece? ¿Cambiaríais algo? Lo que estoy viendo es que igual contra mazos demasiado extremos (excesivamente agresivos o excesivamente controleros) la primera partida lo voy a pasar muy mal, y voy a tener que usar muchas de las cartas del banquillo para tener más posibilidades en la segunda partida.

¡Un saludo!

6

Deck Reviews / [Modern] Control without creatures or planeswalkers... is that possible?

« on: April 07, 2018, 05:11:13 pm »

I wanted to make a enchantments control deck, without creatures or planeswalkers.

After several versions, this is the outcome:


https://deckstats.net/decks/51230/959789-peaceful-control-who-needs-act


What do you think? Would you change something?

7

Deck Comments / Re: I take a bit, now its your turn - Comments

« on: April 04, 2018, 06:44:48 pm »

Losing life is not "damage", so spells that prevent damage do not prevent loss of life (so Intervention Pact is useless).