deckstats.net
You need to be logged in to do this.
The buttons above will open in a new window. Please return to this window after you have logged in. When you have logged in, click the Refresh Session button and then try again.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - AlexL225

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
1
Deck Comments / Re: R/G Power Gruul - Comments
« on: April 17, 2023, 02:12:45 am »
Thank you!

2
Deck Reviews / Re: [Modern] Mono Red Aggro Dragons
« on: May 30, 2017, 05:42:43 am »
What can I say except, I really like this deck.  Dragon's are some of my absolute favorite creatures and this happens to be a nice dragon deck.  Since the printing of thunderbreak regent it has become one of my absolute favorite dragons and I like seeing it in this deck.  I also like the synergy you're running with the damage being given based on the dragons on your battlefield.  Well done!

3
I looks like this deck is on terms with a budget but if you could change out lightning strike for lightning bolt as it is just strictly better all around.  But just a suggestion.  Otherwise nice deck, I'm a big fan of Boros decks!  :)

4
Deck Comments / Re: Black Relentless Rats - Comments
« on: May 19, 2017, 04:41:44 am »
I think you may have started out a little too simple.  Try starting by picking a color that plays to you style and build a strategy around certain creatures and spells with a win strategy.

5
Deck Comments / Re: Black Relentless Rats - Comments
« on: May 19, 2017, 04:34:52 am »
Seriously though, you might need to add a few different cards to this deck in order to make it better.  At least make it a bit more versatile.  Lol.

6
Deck Comments / Re: Black Relentless Rats - Comments
« on: May 19, 2017, 04:32:47 am »
This has got to be the simplest deck I've ever seen. Haha.

7
Deck Comments / Re: B/R Vanquishing Vampire's - Comments
« on: May 10, 2017, 03:35:48 am »
Thank you, I checked your vampire deck out as well and gave it a like.  We do have many similarities in our decks.  I was thinking about getting a Mutavault or two for my deck as well but currently I don't own any.  Also I need to play with my deck a few more times to determine if 22 is the right number of lands or if I could go as low as 20.  I was also very up in the air about running with Dreadbore or using Feast of Blood instead.  I guess it can really depends on the situation if my opponent has planeswalkers or not.  I will keep some of you ideas in mind going forward as I continue to play with this vampire deck and test it out.  Thanks you again for the like and comment.  You have a nice vampire deck as well!

8
I'm not 100% sure on this but isn't there a downside to using polymorph to get Emrakel, the Aeons Torn out?  Since you're not casting it don't you lose out on that extra turn?

9
Deck Comments / Re: How to Demonology: 101 - Comments
« on: May 02, 2017, 07:14:26 am »
Instead of using slaughter games would extirpate work nearly as well for a fraction of the mana?

10
Deck Comments / Re: Signs of Chaos - Comments
« on: January 30, 2017, 01:34:29 am »
So serious!

11
Deck Comments / Re: G/W Emeria Titan - Comments
« on: January 07, 2017, 05:08:28 am »
I see you're using two day of judgment cards and two wrath of god cards.  Why not just use four wrath of god cards instead?  Nice deck by the way. :)

12
Deck Comments / Re: Izzet Dragons - Comments
« on: November 16, 2016, 02:58:06 am »
Nice deck, I love running red and blue together.  I noticed a couple replaceable burn spells that might help make this deck better.  I would definitely replace Lightning Strike with Lightning Bolt as this is perhaps the best burn spell for the mana.  I would also think about maybe replacing Searing Blood with Searing Blaze but that may be more debatable depending on how you view the landfall ability.  Either way, nice deck!

13
Deck Comments / Re: Stoneforge's Master - Comments
« on: October 15, 2016, 10:15:06 pm »
Interesting deck, funny how the side board is 3x the price of the whole main deck.  But those sword of ... and ... cards are pretty expensive.  I like the deck though, nice.

14
Deck Comments / Re: No Library = Win, 10$ deck - Comments
« on: October 15, 2016, 07:03:45 am »
I would go with dissipate over cancel however.  But thats my preference.

15
Deck Comments / Re: No Library = Win, 10$ deck - Comments
« on: October 15, 2016, 07:01:43 am »
Haha, so simple it's brilliant.  I love these kind of decks that win by an unusual way.  Nice.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5