Messages

1

Deck Comments / Re: I hate Magic: The Gathering - Comments

« on: May 15, 2016, 06:35:07 pm »

Removed earth rift as it's three dollars on mtgo, and added in shaleskin plower to give another creature to swing with once your opponents lands are gone.

2

Deck Comments / Re: fuck - Comments

« on: May 13, 2016, 06:08:41 am »

Melira plus persist, I like running this combo alongside any sac engine. GG if that happens on the board.

3

Deck Comments / Re: relentless (budget) - Comments

« on: May 10, 2016, 05:43:59 am »

thrumming stone

4

Deck Comments / Re: Budget U/B Control in Shadows Over Innistrad Standard - Comments

« on: May 10, 2016, 04:57:27 am »

Go Budget deck!

5

Deck Comments / Re: $7 Land Destruction - Comments

« on: May 09, 2016, 06:12:31 am »

Don't run three colors. Run creatures with first strike to clear the beginning board fielded by your opponents field. Most of all, figure out something to do with all the time you're buying with the land destruction.

6

Deck Comments / Re: I hate Magic: The Gathering - Comments

« on: May 08, 2016, 06:56:58 am »

I don't like nonbasic land destruction in this deck, as, by turn four it seems relatively possible for your opponent not to have played any nonbasic lands, unless your playing against tron lol.

7

Deck Reviews / Re: RW Aggro Budget

« on: May 04, 2016, 07:58:08 pm »

Unruly mob is so value, also there are a few too many cmc 4 cards. So I'd suggest shaving some cmc4 and running a playset of unruly mob.

8

Deck Reviews / Re: how is my deck

« on: May 03, 2016, 07:50:27 am »

You do have some strong cards in this deck, it is expected to do well. However if you went to your local card store and found copies of the better cards in your deck, and removed the worse ones, it would be a whole lot stronger.

9

Deck Reviews / Re: how is my deck

« on: May 03, 2016, 04:35:08 am »

Is this from cards you own? Because if it is, that's completely understandable. However, if you are looking to brew a strong deck, I would advise refining your spell base. Because as it is now, the deck is very inconsistent because of the high variance in nonlands.

10

Deck Comments / Re: NO LANDS first turn win - Comments

« on: May 01, 2016, 07:27:28 pm »

I've run this deck. Any removal in the first couple turns actually wins your opponent the game.

11

Deck Comments / Re: I hate Magic: The Gathering - Comments

« on: April 30, 2016, 10:01:23 pm »

Removed Orcish settlers, as it is actually uncommon, just difficult to notice with the weatherlight edition symbol.

12

General Magic / Re: How do you pay for MTG? Budget Tips

« on: April 30, 2016, 07:50:24 am »

First off, sleeving your card IS a MUST. However you CAN do it on a budget! Check out sof penny sleeves by ultra pro, they are not as durable as some, but they get job done and man are they sleek.

There are cheaper deck boxes you can buy, however if you've ever made anything out of duct tape, you'll want to go for that. I had a duct tape deck box for about a year before I got a nice ultra pro suet tower, a cheap, but quality, deckbox.

Mats are going to be expensive, straight up, don't know what to tell you.

And finally, you are playing standard and that's fine, in order to compete and save money, I would suggest going on youtube to the channels [The Mana Source], [Tolarian Community College], and [Mtg Degree] for free tips on playing at the top of your game. As well as this, many of these channels provide budget deck lists for any format.

PS look on deckstats for lists with the "budget" tag.

PSS PLAY PAUPER- https://www.reddit.com/r/Pauper/

13

Deck Comments / Re: Deck Attempt 1: Eldrazi Devoid - Comments

« on: April 30, 2016, 07:36:15 am »

Interesting theme, however the soft green splash does this deck no favors IMO.

14

Deck Comments / Re: rouges - Comments

« on: April 29, 2016, 11:21:03 pm »

This deck has a really high mana curve, I would suggest removing a few cmc 5 creatures.