Messages

1

Deck Comments / Re: God Tribal - Comments

« le: Février 13, 2020, 11:20:34 pm »

sadly Ryad is true, you need to have some way to activate/turn your god in mode on...if not you ve sweet enchantment that do very few...

trying to do that deck for fun too, i'm playing the Child of Alara as a commander, but ne very convincing. better to play Golos, Tireless Pilgrim i suppose.

2

Deck Comments / Re: Varolz, the death shadow - Comments

« le: Janvier 26, 2016, 05:07:01 pm »

..it's a work in progress deck. it has a lot to work on, and get a "definitive version", to make it definetly competitive.. demonic tutor is banned also in legacy and diabolic intent makes the deck lose modern.. if you want to have a legacy deck, i would have suggested also phyrexian dreadnought, or worldly tutor..

well when the deck will be finished i suppose it could be a good one to spend on... i think you miss removals, and 'jund' is fool of great remov as terminate, dreadbore, maelstrom pulse, abrupt decay.. 
 

Obviously I forgot to click on "in progress" ;-)

I play it first in legacy version with the phyrexian yes ;-) but when you play with friends (casual legacy then no metagamed), hexproof creatures are just boring to play...  (my point of view)

Concerning the removal you spotted, i don't forget them, if you see there is no sideboard neither ^^. The point is with change in the meta with the ban of Twin and Bloom and the rise of Eldrazi Bx decks , i had to look the local meta from the place where I play. 
When it will be done it certainly gonna include Terminate, etc ... (Decay is already in 4x ^^) . Same for http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=Thoughtseize
I recognize the potential of dreadbore even if i'm a bit more cold concerning the "sorcery" type in term of reactivity but it as the advantage to kill directly the planeswalker that are almost all bolt proof. (but not drecay for most of them)

I was thinking to had a secondary kill main deck by including 2 http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=inkmoth+nexus. It's certainly more fragile but still anoying. And it can be sided http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=ghost+quarter for in a TRON BR Meta.

Cards are almost all arrived... just miss my http://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=en&card=vexing+devil to test that this end of week I hope :-)
 

3

Deck Comments / Re: Varolz, the death shadow - Comments

« le: Janvier 15, 2016, 10:10:01 pm »

I just realized, 670 bugs for this deck? I hope you didnt buy it already, take 500 dollar and get an awesome deck instead.

Lol I actually already have this deck. But i didn't bought them for this deck lol ;-) but if you look most of the cards are so polyvalent that they are in all good Modern deck ;-). And for the "souls of the deck" Varolz etc, they are not very expensive. But Indeed, I do agree, if you had to buy a deck, this one is not really a good choice, it's just to change a bit from the (my point of view) efficient but boring deck from the tiers 1/2/3 lol ;-).
I just like diversity, and i feel sad to use all the time the same decks :-D

And thanks for the idea of cards, but as i just said, i try to build it to play to some Modern Friday Night ;-). But yes, i a to build a side to deal with that kind of deck (combo, ...), but considering the colours, there is several options that are available ;-)

4

Deck Comments / Re: Varolz, the death shadow - Comments

« le: Décembre 25, 2015, 03:04:31 pm »

The deck is still in construction, i gonna try it, but indeed the problem is when no Varolz, the Scar-Striped ... then i had to look for other option. inserting time of need is indeed an option but playing a cart that just work with one cart is dangerous if we are in front surgical extraction or same kind of card. it's 4 dead cards inside deck without Varolz.

In fact, Tarmo would be a good 2 CCM drop but it's overprice lol ^^

I gonna test it this week and change what is not "ok". For example, i'm not convinced by  Grisly Salvage for example... it's maybe the one card i would remove to introduce "time of need"

5

Deck Comments / Re: Varolz, the death shadow - Comments

« le: Décembre 25, 2015, 02:57:55 pm »

The deck is still in construction, i gonna try it, but indeed the problem is when no Varolz, the Scar-Striped

6

Deck Comments / Re: BWG Treefolk - Comments

« le: Juillet 01, 2015, 12:19:36 pm »

Hello

This is the second version of the deck, the first one was included Doran.

Of course he is a must 5/5 for 3 it's nice but too easy to deal with, no trample...

I had 2 solutions with the new extension (Tarkir) :

- Remove Doran and replace him by Assault Formationhttp://cards.deckstats.net/magiccard.php?lng=fr&card=Assault+Formation ; it comes for 2 , just act on your creatures... but it doesn't put damage by itself...

- Or remove Doran completly and play other Treefolk that will give other advantages on the board. For 3, i always prefer to play an other card. And When the Bosk Bannaret are in game, my drops at 4 CMC  are better drop 3 than Doran, most of the time. (but i can be wrong lol)

For example, I prefer to play doran in that kind of deck (more casual fun) :
http://deckstats.net/decks/36162/241388-bgw-attack-of-the-walls?lng=fr

I give me a board presence and a second option of deal damage with my wall in addition to Assault Formation