deckstats.net
You need to be logged in to do this.
The buttons above will open in a new window. Please return to this window after you have logged in. When you have logged in, click the Refresh Session button and then try again.

Author Topic: Hydromancy - Comments  (Read 598 times)

Comment Bot

  • Guest
Hydromancy - Comments
« on: September 27, 2017, 02:43:42 am »
Hydromancy

This topic has been created automatically to discuss this deck.
Dieses Thema wurde automatisch erstellt, um dieses Deck zu diskutieren.

THEpuy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 284
  • Karma: 185
  • Decks
Re: Hydromancy - Comments
« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2017, 02:43:46 am »
Liked because deck looks cool, then un-liked because trophy mage has no target.

RyujinSaotome

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Karma: 89
  • Decks
Re: Hydromancy - Comments
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2017, 03:08:43 am »
Thanks for bringing that up. Fixing that issue now.

RyujinSaotome

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Karma: 89
  • Decks
Re: Hydromancy - Comments
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2017, 03:15:13 am »
There, now Trophy Mage has a valid target, one which is actually also useful by giving +1/+1 counters when wizards enter the battlefield

THEpuy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 284
  • Karma: 185
  • Decks
Re: Hydromancy - Comments
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2017, 05:15:34 am »
It doesn't say 3 or less. It says 3. Try again :P

RyujinSaotome

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Karma: 89
  • Decks
Re: Hydromancy - Comments
« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2017, 06:30:41 am »
There, NOW I have a CMC artifact of 3 lol. Better?

Skâl

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27
  • Karma: 73
  • Decks
Re: Hydromancy - Comments
« Reply #6 on: September 27, 2017, 04:02:54 pm »
I think your deck doesn't works good, because you play many cards with high manacost. I would play 22 lands, maybe you can reduce some other stuff. I would cut Storm Sculptor and Tempest Caller. I would cut one Search for Azcanta too, because it's legendary and you finish with a 60 card deck :-P

THEpuy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 284
  • Karma: 185
  • Decks
Re: Hydromancy - Comments
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2017, 05:47:08 pm »
there you go

RyujinSaotome

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Karma: 89
  • Decks
Re: Hydromancy - Comments
« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2017, 10:35:58 pm »
Thanks [thecrazymagicman].  And thank you for bringing those to my attention [Skal]. I'll adjust the deck some more :) Thank you for the suggestions everyone!

RyujinSaotome

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Karma: 89
  • Decks
Re: Hydromancy - Comments
« Reply #9 on: September 27, 2017, 10:41:26 pm »
There, dropped 1 Search for Azcanta and both Sorm Sculptor's for 2 more islands.  Seem better?

RickSanchez

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9
  • Karma: 2
  • Decks
Re: Hydromancy - Comments
« Reply #10 on: September 28, 2017, 03:51:04 pm »
I would drop the wizard plan, means:
-2 Baral, Chief of Compliance
-4 Nimble Obstructionist
-4 SirenStormtamer
-2Tempest Caller

add
+4 Riddleform
+4 Enigmadrake
maybe +4 Soul-Scar Mage
and more red removal and more cantrips
Wubba Lubba dub-dub

RyujinSaotome

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Karma: 89
  • Decks
Re: Hydromancy - Comments
« Reply #11 on: September 28, 2017, 09:40:53 pm »
Thanks for your advice [RickSanchez]. However, doing that would unfortunately defeat the purpose of the deck, which is a focus on mono-blue wizards. However if I make a hybrid UR-wizard deck, I might take your suggestions into consideration for building it. I appreciate you giving me advice though :)

Skâl

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27
  • Karma: 73
  • Decks
Re: Hydromancy - Comments
« Reply #12 on: October 21, 2017, 04:26:17 pm »
Looks better, but i would really play 22 - 24 lands.