deckstats.net
You need to be logged in to do this.
The buttons above will open in a new window. Please return to this window after you have logged in. When you have logged in, click the Refresh Session button and then try again.
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Snakes. Why did it have to be snakes? - Comments  (Read 155 times)

Comment Bot

  • Guest
Snakes. Why did it have to be snakes? - Comments
« on: May 11, 2017, 06:57:14 pm »
Snakes. Why did it have to be snakes?

This topic has been created automatically to discuss this deck.
Dieses Thema wurde automatisch erstellt, um dieses Deck zu diskutieren.
Logged

thewolfmars12

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Karma: 0
  • Decks
Re: Snakes. Why did it have to be snakes? - Comments
« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2017, 06:57:21 pm »
For some reason, I feel like a vampire creature could work here. Maybe throw in an artifact. There is a lot of good potential. Awesome deck.
Logged

InstaMix

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • Karma: 43
  • Decks
Re: Snakes. Why did it have to be snakes? - Comments
« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2017, 08:46:44 pm »
I was tempted to put Metallic Mimic in as a token booster, but i feel the difference between having a lot of 2/2's become 4/4's or 1/1's become 3/3's wasn't really worth the room being taken up. As for a Vampire, i assume you mean as a sac mechanic, and that was maybe going to be Vampiric Rites, life gain and card draw but i will have to have a think about what comes out. Cheers for the praise :).
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »