So has anyone's opinion on the bannings and unbanning changed now that there's been 24 hours to digest it?
Now you've done it. Time to rant.
Sheldon has been very vocal in the past about how he doesn't like stax, combo, or anything that doesn't fit the rules committee's vision for commander. And with some of the things he says, it really does sound like he's disconnected from what commander is actually like ("
Wound Reflection takes you out if the game emotionally").
The Commander Advisory Group was a step in the right direction. This is a bunch of people that are connected to other commander players. They receive fan-mail, they make videos, they know what commander is like. Most importantly for something like a banlist change, they know what cards people wanted on and off.
As far as I can tell, the consensus was simple; ban
Flash.
But that's not what happened.
Paradox Engine got the axe. Which is fine, it's a powerful card as well, and I would have been happy to kiss it goodbye... so long as
Flash was going as well.
After watching that video from the Command Zone (like, actually watching. I didn't skim through it this time), I got the impression that the Commander Advisory Group's opinion was largely ignored. Josh certainly didn't want
Paradox Engine to get banned.
The decision to ban
Paradox Engine and Iona wasn't done because the commander community wanted it, and it wasn't done because the Commander Advisory Group wanted it. Sheldon and the rules committee wanted this to happen. This decision was made for themselves, and no one else.