Urza's Saga

[WWolfe]

How many 0 or 1 mana artifacts do you feel you need to run for Urza's Saga to be worth it?

[Morganator 2.0]

Sol Ring. No follow-up needed.

[Somewhitedude001]

I like using it to get Skullclamp and comboing out of nowhere

[CleanBelwas]

I honestly think Sol Ring is enough, Saga is just that good.

Being a land is good.
Being an enchantment is good.
Making Karnstructs is good.
Putting itself in the bin is good.
Tutoring Sol Ring or Skullclamp or Shadowspear or Top is good.

It's just a ridiculously good card and offers so much value in such a variety of decks.

[Aetherium Slinky]

The Constructs alone are quite a lot of value. I've won games with them.

[Fuzzy2Wasy]

On top of what has been mentioned, in the right deck Hangerback Walker or Walking Ballista can be instant win cons. 

However, this seems like a more general question of, is Saga an auto-include for decks.  Based on previous answers, probably yes.

[Aetherium Slinky]

On top of what has been mentioned, in the right deck Hangerback Walker or Walking Ballista can be instant win cons. 

However, this seems like a more general question of, is Saga an auto-include for decks.  Based on previous answers, probably yes.

Urza's Saga cannot find those. Their mana cost isn't exactly {0} or {1}.

[WWolfe]

On top of what has been mentioned, in the right deck Hangerback Walker or Walking Ballista can be instant win cons. 

However, this seems like a more general question of, is Saga an auto-include for decks.  Based on previous answers, probably yes.

Urza's Saga cannot find those. Their mana cost isn't exactly {0} or {1}.

Correct

2021-06-18: While resolving the chapter III ability, you can find only a card with actual mana cost (0) or (1), not mana value 0 or 1. For example, you couldn't find a card with mana cost (B) or one with mana cost (X).

https://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=522335