deckstats.net
You need to be logged in to do this.
The buttons above will open in a new window. Please return to this window after you have logged in. When you have logged in, click the Refresh Session button and then try again.

Author Topic: butt seks with land-D - Comments  (Read 634 times)

Comment Bot

  • Guest
butt seks with land-D - Comments
« on: January 12, 2015, 07:09:18 pm »
This is the comment topic for butt seks with land-D.

Please use the Reply button to comment. If you do not have an account yet, please use the link on top to register.



Dies ist das Kommentarthema für butt seks with land-D.

Bitte benutze den Knopf "Reply", um einen Kommentar zu schreiben. Wenn du noch kein Benutzerkonto hier hast, benutze bitte den Link "Register" (oben) um dich zu registrieren.

sieglsiegl

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 41
  • Karma: 7
  • Decks
Re: butt seks with land-D - Comments
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2015, 07:09:18 pm »
1. You have no commander. Why do you have command tower.
2. This deck is bad, and you should feel bad.
3. It's so pointless.
4. It looks like you tried to make a commander deck, but then failed at it.
5. This deck makes me cry.

ashemath

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25
  • Karma: 45
  • Decks
Re: butt seks with land-D - Comments
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2015, 07:16:41 pm »
It looks like the commander is in the sideboard. No need to be so harsh. It's a game after all.

sieglsiegl

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 41
  • Karma: 7
  • Decks
Re: butt seks with land-D - Comments
« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2015, 07:20:42 pm »
96 cards doesn't make a commander though. That's why I said 'no commander'. It's not even in the featured card list in Statistics.

Reiniant

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 72
  • Karma: 409
  • I play EDH. Need help for budget, I'm your guy!
  • Decks
Re: butt seks with land-D - Comments
« Reply #4 on: January 12, 2015, 07:22:33 pm »
damn siegl harsh much