deckstats.net
You need to be logged in to do this.
The buttons above will open in a new window. Please return to this window after you have logged in. When you have logged in, click the Refresh Session button and then try again.

One man and his Pod // Pako and Haldan EDH // Birthing Pod (EDH / Commander) [Révision 62]

Format compatible avec la plupart des logiciels Magic, y compris Magic Workstation et Cockatrice:

For MTG Arena:

For Magic Online (MTGO):

Autres

Afin d'enregistrer votre deck dans un tournoi officiel ("DCI-sanctioned"), vous avez besoin d'un fiche d'enregistrement ("Deck sheet") Télécharger ici un deck sheet pré-rempli avec les cartes de votre deck!

(-> Vos paramètres)

Nota Bene: Ce service n'est pas un service officiel de la DCI. Veuillez bous assurer que votre deck sheet contient toutes les cartes de votre deck et est homologué par la DCI. En cas d'erreur ou de problème, n'hésitez pas à nous contacter! DCI is a trademark of of Wizards of the Coast LLC.

Veuillez sélectionner les colonnes à afficher:

Révision affichée: 62. There is a more recent version of this deck.

DogPod: A Temur Birthing Pod deck helmed by Temur's strongest(?) commander pairing.

Below is a write-up of one of my favourite EDH decks. This list is crazy fun, very powerful at casual tables, and allows for some really interesting games.

Tl;Dr: Pako and Haldan are strong, and so is Birthing Pod. This deck is super fun and I'd recommend giving it a whirl or trying something similar if you like active decision-making while playing EDH.

Why Pod?

I've been playing EDH for around 2 years now, and I've put together somewhere between 10 and 14 decks over this time. Among these decks, I have some I have barely touched since that initial golden period immediately following building and sleeving-up. These decks tend to be those that offer little variability between games, or do not allow for much proactive decision-making. I've come to realise that what I love as a magic player is what I term agency: being able to actively choose from a range of possible lines of play what I believe to be the most appropriate for a given situation. In stark contrast to my barely-touched decks, those which have garnered my attention more actively and intensely (both in terms of continued list-tweaking and continued play) are those which offer variability and, crucially, agency. Take my Grixis spellslinger/storm deck for example (https://deckstats.net/decks/126763/1416834-jeleva-edh-big-spells-are-bett): no two games with this bad girl are the same - I'm always having to think proactively (as well as reactively) to determine which line I should take next. Decks like this can win fast, but it isn't the ability to win which attracts me so much as the engaging experience these decks provide. I was looking to put together a new creature-based deck, as I felt I had fallen out of love slightly with mine others due to lack of variability or agency (eg Goreclaw - dump fatties, turn sideways, pray no one casts a Wrath).

Enter birthing pod. Pod, and similar cards such as Prime Speaker Vannifar, provide a creature deck with both variability and agency. They enable the tutoring of situation-dependent creatures directly to the battlefield. Such cards offer huge power by virtue of providing with a totally different way to build a creature deck. They allow the inclusion of a multiplicity of one-off (so-called "toolbox") effects, combo lines, and answers to boardstates which creature decks can otherwise struggle with. Each turn playing a pod deck (and thereby each game playing a pod deck) is different - you ask yourself questions and come up with what you think is the best answer for the situation. Should I focus on developing my mana? Should I develop a threat? Should I start piecing together a combo or win condition? Should I take a turn out to answer some threats that would otherwise go unanswered? Is there a busted synergy available to me which I should capitalise on? Sure, you have to know your decklist inside-out, but pod decks can be incredibly fun for players, like myself, who enjoy a mixture of proactive and reactive gameplay.

Why Pako?

As discussed above, I love agency. I love being able to make choices that actively shape the game. And for this, we need cards. Pako provides us with a steady stream of card advantage in a way that is fun and unique, while himself putting pressure on our opponents resources (creatures or life-total depending on how inclined they are to block). it's not unreasonable for him to provide with 2-4 extra cards every time he attacks - and he doesn't even have to connect, which is huge (Tymna eat your heart out). Pako having haste is one of his key features - unless he gets insta-removed, he's always going to generate some value on the turn he comes down, which I love. Importantly, we can even play our opponents lands from the "fetch" zone, and therefore we can run slightly fewer of our own to make room for a bigger tutorable toolbox of good creatures. Sure, we can't play our creatures if Pako fetches them, but I've found that as long as our overall creature count is somewhere south of 30, this isn't too big of a deal. Furthermore, If we can get the good boi out early enough, he can become absolutely huge, presenting a viable win-condition via commander damage. Taking stock then, Pako and Haldan provide us with cards, pressure our opponents, and represents a plausible win/kill condition; this partner pairing has to be a candidate for the most generically good Temur general ever printed. It's also worth noting that we have 2 different CMCs in the command zone, opening up lines for birthing pod effects should we elect to sacrifice our commanders to them in a pinch. Oh, and the art/foiling is gorgeous. 10/10 commander.

General strategy.

Early game:

We need to get the dog out early to take advantage of the cards he provides and the pressure he puts on our opponents. Mulligan until you find ramp (of which there is plenty in the list) and aim for a turn 3-4 Pako. Get swinging, and dig for cards.

Mid game / value engines:

Ideally, we're looking to find some birthing pod pieces to let us dictate the pace of the game. If we can find birthing pod or Vannifar, we're in the money: now we can assess the boardstate and actively decide which of our toolbox creatures is most appropriate at any given time. Need to develop some mana? Find Azusa. Need to slow down the opponents? Venser, Shaper Savant or Reclemation Sage might be appropriate. Looking to generate value++? Look no further than Spark Double - what could be better than two Pakos?

A wide toolbox lets us react to what cards become available to us. If we land a Leyline of Ancitipation, then podding out either Rashmi, Eternities Crafter or Seedborn Muse can only lead to good things. As above, knowing the decklist inside-out is crucial when playing pod.

If we can't find any pod pieces, then we switch to plan B: protect Pako with countermagic or on-board protection and start chipping away at life totals. Various cards support this approrach (Aqueous Form; Rancor; Whispersilk Cloak; Guardian Augmenter; Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar etc).

Late game / top of curve / win conditions.

Notable inclusions.

Notable exclusions.

Cards to consider.

Final thoughts.

Tags

Carte à considérer

This deck appears to be legal in EDH / Commander.

Tour: Your life: Opponent's life: Poison counters:
Main (0)
Library (0)
Graveyard (0)
Exile (0)
Board (0)

Nom

Catégorie

Notes

Power

Toughness

card

Catégorie

Notes

Power

Toughness

 

Counters

Move this card to:

Actions

2-sided (coin flip)
6-sided (d6)
20-sided (d20)
Sides:

Auto-draw

Auto-untap

Double-click to open card details.

Move selected to:

Rentabilité combinée

Montant min.:
Carte:

Calcul personnalisé

Si je joue une carte fois dans mon deck de ? carters, quelles sont les chances que je la pioche fois?
  Nom Main Tour 1 Tour 2 Tour 3 Tour 4 Tour 5 Tour 6 Tour 7 Tour 8 Tour 9 Tour 10

Probabilités aditionnelles

Intégrer Dans Forums ou Site

Pour les forums ou les blogs, veuillez sélectioner une des options BB-Code Pour les sites ou les forums qui supportent HTML (e.g. Wizards Community Forums), vous pouvez utiliser les options HTML!

Lien vers ce Deck

Here are some suggestions for cards you could add to your deck, based on decks that other players have built with this Commander.

Please add some cards to the deck to see card suggestions.

Unfortunately, we could not detect a Commander in this deck. Please choose it here to view card suggestions. To make sure this deck is analyzed properly in the future, please flag your Commander in the deckbuilder or put it in a separate section called "Commander".
Score Nom de Carte Catégorie Mana Rareté Salt
Grace à edhrec.com!
Voici toutes les révisions de ce deck. Cliquez sur une révision afin d'afficher à quoi ce deck ressemblait précédemment.
  Comparer Révision Créé Par
Révision 70 Août 6, 2022 aacwright
Révision 69 Octobre 10, 2021 aacwright
Révision 68 Octobre 10, 2021 aacwright
Révision 67 Juillet 21, 2021 aacwright
Révision 66 Juillet 21, 2021 aacwright
Révision 65 Juillet 19, 2021 aacwright
Révision 64 Juillet 19, 2021 aacwright
Révision 63 Juillet 19, 2021 aacwright
» Révision 62 Juillet 19, 2021 aacwright
Révision 61 Juillet 17, 2021 aacwright
Révision 60 Juillet 15, 2021 aacwright
Révision 59 Juillet 15, 2021 aacwright
Révision 58 Juillet 15, 2021 aacwright
Révision 57 Juillet 15, 2021 aacwright
Révision 56 Juillet 15, 2021 aacwright
Révision 55 Juin 3, 2021 aacwright
Révision 54 Mars 31, 2021 aacwright
Révision 53 Mars 29, 2021 aacwright
Révision 52 Mars 19, 2021 aacwright
Révision 51 Janvier 29, 2021 aacwright
Révision 50 Décembre 18, 2020 aacwright
Révision 49 Décembre 6, 2020 aacwright
Révision 48 Décembre 6, 2020 aacwright
Révision 47 Décembre 6, 2020 aacwright
Révision 46 Décembre 5, 2020 aacwright
Révision 45 Décembre 5, 2020 aacwright
Révision 44 Novembre 14, 2020 aacwright
Révision 43 Novembre 13, 2020 aacwright
Révision 42 Novembre 9, 2020 aacwright
Révision 41 Octobre 11, 2020 aacwright
Révision 40 Octobre 7, 2020 aacwright
Révision 39 Octobre 6, 2020 aacwright
Révision 38 Septembre 30, 2020 aacwright
Révision 37 Septembre 30, 2020 aacwright
Révision 36 Septembre 30, 2020 aacwright
Révision 35 Septembre 29, 2020 aacwright
Révision 34 Septembre 29, 2020 aacwright
Révision 33 Septembre 29, 2020 aacwright
Révision 32 Septembre 29, 2020 aacwright
Révision 31 Septembre 29, 2020 aacwright
Révision 30 Septembre 29, 2020 aacwright
Révision 29 Septembre 29, 2020 aacwright
Révision 28 Septembre 28, 2020 aacwright
Révision 27 Septembre 28, 2020 aacwright
Révision 26 Septembre 28, 2020 aacwright
Révision 25 Septembre 28, 2020 aacwright
Révision 24 Septembre 28, 2020 aacwright
Révision 23 Septembre 28, 2020 aacwright
Révision 22 Septembre 28, 2020 aacwright
Révision 21 Septembre 28, 2020 aacwright
Révision 20 Septembre 28, 2020 aacwright
Révision 19 Septembre 27, 2020 aacwright
Révision 18 Septembre 27, 2020 aacwright
Révision 17 Septembre 27, 2020 aacwright
Révision 16 Septembre 26, 2020 aacwright
Révision 15 Septembre 26, 2020 aacwright
Révision 14 Septembre 26, 2020 aacwright
Révision 13 Septembre 26, 2020 aacwright
Révision 12 Septembre 26, 2020 aacwright
Révision 11 Septembre 24, 2020 aacwright
Révision 10 Septembre 24, 2020 aacwright
Révision 9 Septembre 24, 2020 aacwright
Révision 8 Septembre 24, 2020 aacwright
Révision 7 Septembre 24, 2020 aacwright
Révision 6 Septembre 24, 2020 aacwright
Révision 5 Septembre 24, 2020 aacwright
Révision 4 Septembre 24, 2020 aacwright
Révision 3 Septembre 24, 2020 aacwright
Révision 2 Septembre 24, 2020 aacwright
Révision 1 Septembre 24, 2020 aacwright
Aucun commentaire à propos de ce deck pour le moment.
Les noms de cartes en anglais seront liées automatiquement
De plus, vous pouvez utiliser du BB Code (like [b][/b], [url=...][/url], etc.)!

An error with your login session occured:
unknown
You can do this in a different tab to avoid losing the data you entered here. Once you are done, click the Refresh Session button and then try again.
If the problem persists, please contact us.