deckstats.net
You need to be logged in to do this.
The buttons above will open in a new window. Please return to this window after you have logged in. When you have logged in, click the Refresh Session button and then try again.

One man and his Pod // Pako and Haldan EDH // Birthing Pod (EDH / Commander) [Revisão 62]

Para a maioria dos softwares de Magic, incluindo Magic Workstation e Cockatrice:

For MTG Arena:

Para Magic Online (MTGO):

Para outros:

Para jogar com seu deck em um torneio oficial ("sancionado por DCI"), você precisa de uma folha de listagem de deck. Aqui você pode baixar tal folha já preenchida com os cards desse deck!

(-> Suas Configurações)

Favor notar que: Esse não é um serviço oficial DCI. Logo, sempre se certifique que a folha contém todas as cartas de seu deck, e atende a todos os requisitos DCI. Caso note algo errado, favor entrar em contato conosco! DCI is a trademark of of Wizards of the Coast LLC.

Favor selecionar as colunas que você gostaria de ver:

Visualizando revisão 62. There is a more recent version of this deck.

DogPod: A Temur Birthing Pod deck helmed by Temur's strongest(?) commander pairing.

Below is a write-up of one of my favourite EDH decks. This list is crazy fun, very powerful at casual tables, and allows for some really interesting games.

Tl;Dr: Pako and Haldan are strong, and so is Birthing Pod. This deck is super fun and I'd recommend giving it a whirl or trying something similar if you like active decision-making while playing EDH.

Why Pod?

I've been playing EDH for around 2 years now, and I've put together somewhere between 10 and 14 decks over this time. Among these decks, I have some I have barely touched since that initial golden period immediately following building and sleeving-up. These decks tend to be those that offer little variability between games, or do not allow for much proactive decision-making. I've come to realise that what I love as a magic player is what I term agency: being able to actively choose from a range of possible lines of play what I believe to be the most appropriate for a given situation. In stark contrast to my barely-touched decks, those which have garnered my attention more actively and intensely (both in terms of continued list-tweaking and continued play) are those which offer variability and, crucially, agency. Take my Grixis spellslinger/storm deck for example (https://deckstats.net/decks/126763/1416834-jeleva-edh-big-spells-are-bett): no two games with this bad girl are the same - I'm always having to think proactively (as well as reactively) to determine which line I should take next. Decks like this can win fast, but it isn't the ability to win which attracts me so much as the engaging experience these decks provide. I was looking to put together a new creature-based deck, as I felt I had fallen out of love slightly with mine others due to lack of variability or agency (eg Goreclaw - dump fatties, turn sideways, pray no one casts a Wrath).

Enter birthing pod. Pod, and similar cards such as Prime Speaker Vannifar, provide a creature deck with both variability and agency. They enable the tutoring of situation-dependent creatures directly to the battlefield. Such cards offer huge power by virtue of providing with a totally different way to build a creature deck. They allow the inclusion of a multiplicity of one-off (so-called "toolbox") effects, combo lines, and answers to boardstates which creature decks can otherwise struggle with. Each turn playing a pod deck (and thereby each game playing a pod deck) is different - you ask yourself questions and come up with what you think is the best answer for the situation. Should I focus on developing my mana? Should I develop a threat? Should I start piecing together a combo or win condition? Should I take a turn out to answer some threats that would otherwise go unanswered? Is there a busted synergy available to me which I should capitalise on? Sure, you have to know your decklist inside-out, but pod decks can be incredibly fun for players, like myself, who enjoy a mixture of proactive and reactive gameplay.

Why Pako?

As discussed above, I love agency. I love being able to make choices that actively shape the game. And for this, we need cards. Pako provides us with a steady stream of card advantage in a way that is fun and unique, while himself putting pressure on our opponents resources (creatures or life-total depending on how inclined they are to block). it's not unreasonable for him to provide with 2-4 extra cards every time he attacks - and he doesn't even have to connect, which is huge (Tymna eat your heart out). Pako having haste is one of his key features - unless he gets insta-removed, he's always going to generate some value on the turn he comes down, which I love. Importantly, we can even play our opponents lands from the "fetch" zone, and therefore we can run slightly fewer of our own to make room for a bigger tutorable toolbox of good creatures. Sure, we can't play our creatures if Pako fetches them, but I've found that as long as our overall creature count is somewhere south of 30, this isn't too big of a deal. Furthermore, If we can get the good boi out early enough, he can become absolutely huge, presenting a viable win-condition via commander damage. Taking stock then, Pako and Haldan provide us with cards, pressure our opponents, and represents a plausible win/kill condition; this partner pairing has to be a candidate for the most generically good Temur general ever printed. It's also worth noting that we have 2 different CMCs in the command zone, opening up lines for birthing pod effects should we elect to sacrifice our commanders to them in a pinch. Oh, and the art/foiling is gorgeous. 10/10 commander.

General strategy.

Early game:

We need to get the dog out early to take advantage of the cards he provides and the pressure he puts on our opponents. Mulligan until you find ramp (of which there is plenty in the list) and aim for a turn 3-4 Pako. Get swinging, and dig for cards.

Mid game / value engines:

Ideally, we're looking to find some birthing pod pieces to let us dictate the pace of the game. If we can find birthing pod or Vannifar, we're in the money: now we can assess the boardstate and actively decide which of our toolbox creatures is most appropriate at any given time. Need to develop some mana? Find Azusa. Need to slow down the opponents? Venser, Shaper Savant or Reclemation Sage might be appropriate. Looking to generate value++? Look no further than Spark Double - what could be better than two Pakos?

A wide toolbox lets us react to what cards become available to us. If we land a Leyline of Ancitipation, then podding out either Rashmi, Eternities Crafter or Seedborn Muse can only lead to good things. As above, knowing the decklist inside-out is crucial when playing pod.

If we can't find any pod pieces, then we switch to plan B: protect Pako with countermagic or on-board protection and start chipping away at life totals. Various cards support this approrach (Aqueous Form; Rancor; Whispersilk Cloak; Guardian Augmenter; Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar etc).

Late game / top of curve / win conditions.

Notable inclusions.

Notable exclusions.

Cards to consider.

Final thoughts.

Tags

Maybeboard

This deck appears to be legal in EDH / Commander.

Turno: Your life: Opponent's life: Poison counters:
Mão (0)
Library (0)
Graveyard (0)
Exile (0)
Board (0)

Nome

Tipo

Notes

Power

Toughness

card

Tipo

Notes

Power

Toughness

 

Counters

Move this card to:

Actions

2-sided (coin flip)
6-sided (d6)
20-sided (d20)
Sides:

Auto-draw

Auto-untap

Double-click to open card details.

Move selected to:

Probabilidade combinada

Quantidade mínima:
Carta:

Cálculo personalizado

Se eu tiver cópias de uma carta no meu deck de ? cartas, qual a probabilidade de comprá-la vezes?
  Nome Mão Turno 1 Turno 2 Turno 3 Turno 4 Turno 5 Turno 6 Turno 7 Turno 8 Turno 9 Turno 10

Probabilidades Adicionais

Incorporado para Fóruns ou Websites

Para fóruns e blogs favor selecionar uma das opções de BB-Code. Para websites e fóruns que suportem HTML (p.ex. Wizards Community Forums) você pode usar as opções de HTML!

Link para esse deck

Here are some suggestions for cards you could add to your deck, based on decks that other players have built with this Commander.

Please add some cards to the deck to see card suggestions.

Unfortunately, we could not detect a Commander in this deck. Please choose it here to view card suggestions. To make sure this deck is analyzed properly in the future, please flag your Commander in the deckbuilder or put it in a separate section called "Commander".
Score Nome de Carta Tipo Mana Raridade Salt
Um oferecimento edhrec.com!
Aqui estão todas as revisões desse deck. Clique em uma revisão para visualizar o deck como ele era anteriormente.
  Comparar Revisão Criado Por
Revisão 70 Agosto 6, 2022 aacwright
Revisão 69 Outubro 10, 2021 aacwright
Revisão 68 Outubro 10, 2021 aacwright
Revisão 67 Julho 21, 2021 aacwright
Revisão 66 Julho 21, 2021 aacwright
Revisão 65 Julho 19, 2021 aacwright
Revisão 64 Julho 19, 2021 aacwright
Revisão 63 Julho 19, 2021 aacwright
» Revisão 62 Julho 19, 2021 aacwright
Revisão 61 Julho 17, 2021 aacwright
Revisão 60 Julho 15, 2021 aacwright
Revisão 59 Julho 15, 2021 aacwright
Revisão 58 Julho 15, 2021 aacwright
Revisão 57 Julho 15, 2021 aacwright
Revisão 56 Julho 15, 2021 aacwright
Revisão 55 Junho 3, 2021 aacwright
Revisão 54 Março 31, 2021 aacwright
Revisão 53 Março 29, 2021 aacwright
Revisão 52 Março 19, 2021 aacwright
Revisão 51 Janeiro 29, 2021 aacwright
Revisão 50 Dezembro 18, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 49 Dezembro 6, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 48 Dezembro 6, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 47 Dezembro 6, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 46 Dezembro 5, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 45 Dezembro 5, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 44 Novembro 14, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 43 Novembro 13, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 42 Novembro 9, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 41 Outubro 11, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 40 Outubro 7, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 39 Outubro 6, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 38 Setembro 30, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 37 Setembro 30, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 36 Setembro 30, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 35 Setembro 29, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 34 Setembro 29, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 33 Setembro 29, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 32 Setembro 29, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 31 Setembro 29, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 30 Setembro 29, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 29 Setembro 29, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 28 Setembro 28, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 27 Setembro 28, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 26 Setembro 28, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 25 Setembro 28, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 24 Setembro 28, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 23 Setembro 28, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 22 Setembro 28, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 21 Setembro 28, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 20 Setembro 28, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 19 Setembro 27, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 18 Setembro 27, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 17 Setembro 27, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 16 Setembro 26, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 15 Setembro 26, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 14 Setembro 26, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 13 Setembro 26, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 12 Setembro 26, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 11 Setembro 24, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 10 Setembro 24, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 9 Setembro 24, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 8 Setembro 24, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 7 Setembro 24, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 6 Setembro 24, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 5 Setembro 24, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 4 Setembro 24, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 3 Setembro 24, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 2 Setembro 24, 2020 aacwright
Revisão 1 Setembro 24, 2020 aacwright
Não existem comentários para esse deck ainda.
nomes de carta em Inglês serão automaticamente linkados.
Além disso, você pode usar BBCode (como [b][/b], [url=...][/url] e etc.) aqui!

An error with your login session occured:
unknown
You can do this in a different tab to avoid losing the data you entered here. Once you are done, click the Refresh Session button and then try again.
If the problem persists, please contact us.