Para la mayoría de software de Magic, incluído Magic Workstation y Cockatrice:
For MTG Arena:
Para Magic Online (MTGO):
Para otros:
Para jugar tu mazo en un torneo ("Oficial DCI") necesitas tener una hoja de registro de mazo. ¡Desde aquí puedes descargar esa hoja rellenada con las cartas de este mazo!
Por favor, entiende que este no es un servicio oficial del DCI. Asegúrate de que la lista contiene todas las cartas de tu mazo y de que cumple todos los requisitos de los torneos oficiales DCI. Si adviertes algo erróneo, por favor, ¡comunícanoslo! DCI is a trademark of of Wizards of the Coast LLC.
The main goal of this deck is to enhance interactions by combat, while deterring opponents to attack the crown. This decklist was carefully built with a budget in mind (~150 euros from cardmarket) and tries to improve the game experience of all players around the table while maintaining a decent power level (this is not a group hug).
For these reasons, you'll see that this decklist varies significantly from other Queen Marchesa's decks, mostly by restricting the amount of stax, aikido and increasing the political and combat based archetype.
The main strength of this deck is to never be too threatening to the group. For these reason a lot of group hate cards are not included because we do not want to draw attention towards us. This makes it a strong deck in multiplayer games, where due to its high amount of interactions it will help us create alliances and turn opponents against each other. Thanks to these politics, it often lets us finish in 1v1 situations where we can finish our opponent through combat or burst.
In the following sections I've grouped cards by the main ideas this decks wants to do:
WORK IN PROGRESS
Looks like a controversial title but I'll try to explain myself. In previous versions of this decklist, I was running cards like Wound Reflection or Kambal, Consul of Allocation, which are very strong but come
with a drawback: shifting the table attention towards the Queen. This is completely the opposite of what this deck wants to do ! Most of the time, if your pod has a good threat assessment these kind of permanents will be destroyed before one table turn. So if you're not using them to directly finish the game I think these cards anti-synergies with the deck, which is why I've replaced Wound Reflection with Dictate of the Twin Gods that I always use with flash to finish the game.
In contrary, "weaker" permanents are much more suitable here (and by weaker I mean permanents that don't directly create a big threat) . They have two main advantages: first they are less likely to be targeted by removal, second they usually have a lower CMC.
Take for example Sphere of Safety and Spear of Heliod. The first cost 2 more mana and is often much better at preventing players from attacking you. For these reasons Sphere of Safety is card that will be seen as a "problem" for all my opponents and likely to get removed. On the other hand, the Spear of Heliod is a tool of dissuasion which can become political: say for example, "If you don't remove it, I will not destroy this creature with the spear". So opponents will often want to keep their removal for stronger permanents and even if they do remove it, you only lost 3 manas to cast it not 5.
After multiples games, your pod will likely understand that apart from big X finisher spells, you're not going to be a direct threat to the group. For these reasons it's usually a deck that will not get targeted first and likely to stay long enough to have a important impact on the game whether it wins or not.
One of the Great advantages of building with a budget restriction is to look for alternative cheaper cards. I personally much prefer running little bit weaker alternatives that fit a theme of my deck than staples that are auto-included in 90% of Mardu decks (like Wrath of God for example). Bear in mind, that this is my personal opinion and if you prefer to run your staples like most of my pod do, just go for it.
Although sometimes there are just not any good alternative to a staple, most of the times I believe you can find a card that has almost the same effect without loosing too much power level.
Take Promise of Loyalty for example, it's a 5 CMC boardwipe that leaves one creature for each player. In most decks and situations it'll be seen as a much weaker version than Wrath of God. However in this Queen Marchesa decklist which wants opponents to attack each other the card becomes much stronger: it reads "sacrifices" instead of "destroy" and prevents the remaining creatures from attacking us basically granting two desirable effects from a single card.
Don't misunderstand me, in some cases staples are so broken that removing them will clearly lower the power of your deck. You'll see for example that I'm running Anguished Unmaking, Swords to Plowshares, Grim Tutor, etc... However because I wanted to run 11 removals, at some point the 10th and 11th staples were relatively bad enough for me to consider spicier alternatives. So I've replaced them with cards like Council's Judgment that greatly improves the interaction and fun of the game for everyone and Soul Snare which is an insanely good card specifically for this deck.
Finally being on a budget forced me to search for alternatives of expensive cards. When I started looking for tutors I knew that I couldn't afford Demonic Tutor, but at the same time Diabolic Tutor felt like an absurdly worse version. The alternative I've found: the transmute mechanic from Shred Memory. I've basically build my deck around it, preferring every 2 CMC cards over others : looking for a finisher ? Go find Torment of Hailfire, 2CMC. Protection for your permanents ? Boros Charm, 2CMC. A removal ? Vanishing Verse, Terminate, etc... A Boardwipe ? Starstorm ! I'm not affraid to say that in this deck, Shred Memory is an uncounterable Grim Tutor that doesn't tax your life.
2-sided (coin flip) | |
---|---|
6-sided (d6) | |
20-sided (d20) | |
Sides: |
Double-click to open card details.
Nombre | Mano | Turno 1 | Turno 2 | Turno 3 | Turno 4 | Turno 5 | Turno 6 | Turno 7 | Turno 8 | Turno 9 | Turno 10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Probabilidades adicionales |
Please add some cards to the deck to see card suggestions.
Score | Nombre de la carta | Tipo | Maná | Rareza | Salt |
---|
Comparar | Revisión | Creado | Por | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
» | Revisión 135 | Julio 30, 2023 | Kyiwa | |||
Revisión 134 | Julio 30, 2023 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 133 | Marzo 1, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 132 | Marzo 1, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 131 | Marzo 1, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 130 | Marzo 1, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 129 | Marzo 1, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 127 | Febrero 28, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 126 | Febrero 26, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 125 | Febrero 26, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 124 | Febrero 26, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 123 | Febrero 26, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 122 | Febrero 25, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 121 | Febrero 25, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 120 | Febrero 25, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 119 | Febrero 24, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 118 | Febrero 24, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 117 | Febrero 23, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 116 | Febrero 22, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 115 | Febrero 22, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 114 | Febrero 22, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 113 | Febrero 21, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 112 | Febrero 21, 2022 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 111 | Septiembre 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 110 | Septiembre 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 109 | Septiembre 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 108 | Septiembre 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 107 | Septiembre 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 106 | Septiembre 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 105 | Septiembre 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 104 | Septiembre 26, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 103 | Septiembre 25, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 102 | Septiembre 25, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 101 | Septiembre 25, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 100 | Septiembre 25, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 99 | Septiembre 25, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 98 | Septiembre 25, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 97 | Septiembre 24, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 96 | Septiembre 20, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 95 | Septiembre 17, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 94 | Septiembre 17, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 93 | Septiembre 16, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 92 | Septiembre 11, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 91 | Septiembre 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 90 | Agosto 23, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 88 | Agosto 22, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 87 | Agosto 21, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 86 | Agosto 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 85 | Agosto 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 84 | Agosto 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 83 | Agosto 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 82 | Agosto 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 81 | Agosto 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 80 | Julio 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 79 | Julio 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 78 | Julio 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 77 | Julio 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 76 | Julio 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 75 | Julio 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 74 | Julio 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 73 | Julio 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 72 | Julio 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 71 | Julio 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 70 | Julio 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 69 | Julio 31, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 68 | Julio 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 67 | Julio 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 66 | Julio 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 65 | Julio 29, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 64 | Julio 27, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 63 | Junio 9, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 62 | Junio 9, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 61 | Mayo 30, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 60 | Mayo 16, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 59 | Mayo 16, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 58 | Mayo 16, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 57 | Mayo 14, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 56 | Mayo 14, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 55 | Mayo 14, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 54 | Mayo 14, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 53 | Mayo 14, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 52 | Mayo 11, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 51 | Mayo 11, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 50 | Mayo 11, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 49 | Mayo 11, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 48 | Mayo 11, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 47 | Mayo 8, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 46 | Mayo 8, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 44 | Mayo 8, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 43 | Mayo 7, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 42 | Mayo 7, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 41 | Mayo 7, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 40 | Mayo 6, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 39 | Mayo 6, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 38 | Mayo 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 37 | Mayo 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 35 | Mayo 5, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 34 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 33 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 32 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 31 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 30 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 29 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 28 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 27 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 26 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 25 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 24 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 23 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 22 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 21 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 20 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 19 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 18 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 17 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 16 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 15 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 14 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 13 | Mayo 4, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 12 | Mayo 3, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 11 | Mayo 3, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 10 | Mayo 3, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 8 | Mayo 2, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 7 | Mayo 2, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 6 | Mayo 2, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 5 | Mayo 2, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 3 | Mayo 2, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 2 | Mayo 2, 2021 | Kyiwa | ||||
Revisión 1 | Mayo 2, 2021 | Kyiwa |