Nachrichten

1696

Deck Reviews / Re: [Standard] How can i improve this deck?

« am: Dezember 11, 2015, 07:07:46 Nachmittag »

just throwing this out there, lol you can throw it away.  how about zendikar's roll for the elemental aspect?

1697

Deck Reviews / Re: [EDH / Commander] Plunder the Graves

« am: Dezember 11, 2015, 06:56:10 Nachmittag »

vampiric tutor and demonic tutor aren't that expensive online, But agree for now diabolic tutor works . Goat would work to well with jarad,
Remember all creatures get X/X where X is the highest power among your creatures, and trample.
Jarad is say a 5/5, he and goat attack, makes him a 10/10 with trample, more added pressure on your opponent .

1698

General Magic / Re: MTG Christmas Cards

« am: Dezember 11, 2015, 06:46:50 Nachmittag »

lol how about santa's sack, something like indistructble for the endless presents it holds. At the beginning of end step
put a counter ( present ) on/in sack. Beginning of your upkeep flip a coin for every opponent. If it is heads, deal that much
damage to opponent on how many counters, they where naughty. Tails does no damage cause they where nice.

1699

General Magic / Re: Zada + Chandra's Ignition

« am: Dezember 11, 2015, 06:33:02 Nachmittag »

Lets do this as easily possible . lol at least I hope. Zada is on the field, its your turn. 1.) You cast ignition on zada, 2.) Zada's ability goes off 3.) Response to yourself you cast mist on zada 4.) Zada's ability goes off ... As said before, last to first. So now it goes 4,3,2,1
while remembering Zada's ability goes off when something is "cast" at specifically him, not when a spell "resolves".

Zada's ability works like heroic and prowress, go off when something is cast, not when something resolves.

1700

General Magic / Re: MTG Christmas Cards

« am: Dezember 11, 2015, 04:55:34 Nachmittag »

I like it, but no elves? or even frosty? how about herbie the dentist elf or rudolph's girlfriend? I forget her name which begins with a C I do believe?

1701

General Magic / Re: Zada + Chandra's Ignition

« am: Dezember 11, 2015, 04:50:23 Nachmittag »

Actually we have to go by the stack. Last to first... First was chandra's ignition, then enshrouding mist. Since the mist was
placed last, its effects go off before the ignition. Then if the mist targets zada then that goes on the stack before c
the ignition. Then ignition goes off, again if you target zada then again more on the stack and zada again goes off.
Now if your opponent plays cancel after you play ignition, priority I think but not entirely sure. We have ignition, cancel,
and then mist. Last to first, just have to remember the stack.

1702

Deck Reviews / Re: [EDH / Commander] Plunder the Graves

« am: Dezember 11, 2015, 03:27:03 Vormittag »

you took out the goat? he is my favorite attacker in this set , I am working on this deck as well, just more recursion. You also going to replace diabolic tutor with demonic tutor or vampiric tutor?

1703

Deck Reviews / Re: [Standard] bwg allies

« am: Dezember 08, 2015, 04:22:52 Vormittag »

In the midst of pulling a gideon from a pack today, I dropped a swamp and put him in.

1704

General Magic / Re: Favorite Combos

« am: Dezember 08, 2015, 12:49:25 Vormittag »

Actually you are copying , not casting and there is a diffrence. Hence there is a casting cost but 0 copying costs. For example:
You pay X to do X damage for a cost of a spell to cast it, copy does exactly that, copies so there is no payment. Only payment is the cost for the spell, which is that of copy. Better example: cast lava axe for 5 mana, dealing 5 damage. Then cast reverberate for 2 mana which makes a copy and deals 5 more damage. No additional cost of 5, making it 7 to get out the copy.
So again, casting and copying are 2 diffrent things. Fling is another that comes to mind, you sacrifice a creature to cast, but pay nothing to copy it.

1705

Deck Reviews / Re: [Standard] Abzan Red

« am: Dezember 04, 2015, 10:24:28 Nachmittag »

Time to think outside the box, instead of meta for starters.

1706

Deck Reviews / Re: [Standard] Allied front w/control

« am: Dezember 04, 2015, 10:22:11 Nachmittag »

so you have 6 cretures that relie on ally encapment, out of 62 cards, how many times will you think that will happen? I think lessen the red drops that relie on ally encapment.

1707

Deck Reviews / Re: [Standard] bwg allies

« am: Dezember 04, 2015, 10:15:04 Nachmittag »

No problem. Last ideas for the deck; retreat to kazandu, hunt the weak, earthen arms, dragonscale boon. What these things all have in common?.....+1/+1 counters and secondary effects for combat tricks. Best of luck to you man.

Thanks but I have an old heroic, outlast deck I can change if need be

1708

Deck Reviews / Re: roil rampage

« am: Dezember 04, 2015, 05:03:01 Nachmittag »

be interesting to see how this works against the deathmist raptor / den protector combo. The meta so to speak

1709

Deck Reviews / Re: [Standard] bwg allies

« am: Dezember 04, 2015, 04:40:35 Nachmittag »

Are you referring to actually getting your mana or just actually getting creatures and spells into play? Because if the mana build up is what you want then you could play cards like seek the horizon to add three lands to your hand and then play the swell of growth to drop them every turn. Then is you play restore you can add that same card seek the horizon back on top of your deck and you can play it next turn. This would lead to some fast deck thinning to get the spells and creatures you need.

Great idea, but I went a difrrent route, put in 3 servant of the scale for sword of the animist and the 2 grovetender druids. Going tonight ti FNM and test it. I do hope someone can come up with more use in a deck using the slab hammer combo
better than I did. Now time to work on my EDH deck. Thanks everyone for thier help and input.

1710

Deck Reviews / Re: [Standard] bwg allies

« am: Dezember 01, 2015, 05:48:31 Nachmittag »

Updated again , going with my very first thought to make this. Use this combo and try to build around it.
Have retreat to kanzandu on the field, slab hammer equipped to creature, play sandstone bridge, attack
with creature, play swell of growth, and replay sandstone bridge.

Example: 1/1 creature gets + 1 + 1 and vigilance from land of sandstone bridge. Making it a 2/2, now
landfall trigger of a + 1 + 1 counter making it now a 3/3. Attack and swing using slab hammer, using
hammer's ability, return land. Return sandstone bridge , making creature a 5/5 , hammer gives
creature +2 +2. Play swell of growth which is another +2 +2 , making creature 7/7. Swell of
growth also allows me to play a land. Replay sandstone bridge, another +1 +1 , making
creature 8/8, along with another land trigger, up to a 9/9. Now with retreat to emeria on the field as
well that creature could become an 11/11 with vigilance. 2-3 creatures on the field and what creatures are blocking,
all the creatures you have can change. Play swell of growth on another creature. give 2 counters on
another, ect..

With the other fetch lands, this works as well. All in the timing. Biggest issue I keep seeing, is how to
start this whole ball rolling, I have the allies to complement, just need a way to get that push to get going.
I am thinking possibly blisterpod?