Messages

1

Deck Reviews / [Standard] Tetsuko, the Protector

« on: May 13, 2018, 12:30:52 am »

Tetsuko, the Protector

2

Deck Reviews / Re: [Standard] Angels and Knights

« on: April 24, 2018, 10:45:49 pm »

I've heard conflicting dates on it. Where do you get that date? I've been told it's not going out until Fall, when Amonkhet block gets pushed out also.

3

Deck Reviews / [Standard] Angels and Knights

« on: April 24, 2018, 09:05:29 pm »

Angels and Knights
Thoughts?

4

Deck Reviews / [Standard] Mana Ramp Elf/Saprolings

« on: April 24, 2018, 08:46:27 pm »

Mana Ramp Elf/Saprolings

Marwyn, the Nurturer combos with the other elves to create a good amount of mana early game; then, use of the buffs and spore spam at the end will overwhelm the opponent in a hope for victory.

5

Deck Comments / Re: Mana Ramp Dinos - Comments

« on: April 21, 2018, 07:31:24 am »

I want to see what I can do to adjust this deck and really just morph it into some disgusting mana ramp good enough to compete in the local standard Showdowns. If anyone could offer some advice or suggestions, it'd be greatly appreciated.

Revision 2

Added/removed cards:
-1 Ghalta, Primal Hunger
+1 Ajani Unyielding
+1 Ajani, Valiant Protector
+4 Beneath the Sands
+4 Blinding Fog
+4 Carnage Tyrant
+4 Commune with Dinosaurs
+2 Desert of the Fervent
+4 Desert of the Indomitable
+2 Evolving Wilds
+1 Field of Ruin
+11 Forest
+4 Gift of Paradise
+4 Gishath, Sun's Avatar
+1 Huatli, Dinosaur Knight
+2 Inspiring Vantage
+1 Mountain
+4 Regisaur Alpha
+4 Strength of the Pack
+4 (SB) Ancient Brontodon

Changed amounts:
-4 (Main) +4 (SB) Kinjalli's Caller
-4 (Main) +4 (SB) Otepec Huntmaster

6

Deck Reviews / Re: [Standard] Treasure Theft

« on: March 21, 2018, 08:24:16 pm »

Revision 7

Added/removed cards:
-4 Duress
-4 Unburden
+4 Grasping Scoundrel

Changed amounts:
+4 (Main) -4 (SB) Deadeye Plunderers
-4 (Main) +4 (SB) Heartless Pillage
-2 (Main) +2 (SB) Pirate's Prize
+2 (Main) -2 (SB) Prosperous Pirates
+4 (Main) -4 (SB) Prying Blade

7

Deck Comments / Re: Zombie Army - Comments

« on: February 27, 2018, 09:14:39 pm »

Revision 4

Added/removed cards:
+4 Cryptbreaker
+4 Harsh Scrutiny
+21 Swamp

Changed amounts:
-4 (Main) +1 (SB) Oath of Liliana
-2 (Main) +2 (SB) Zombie Apocalypse

8

Deck Reviews / Re: [Standard] Vampire Army

« on: February 16, 2018, 02:38:41 am »

Revision 9

Added/removed cards:
-2 Axis of Mortality
-2 Sanguine Sacrament
+2 Elenda, the Dusk Rose
+4 Legion Lieutenant

Changed amounts:
-2 (Main) +2 (SB) Renewed Faith

9

Deck Reviews / Re: [Standard] Vampire Army

« on: December 14, 2017, 04:10:27 am »

Revision 8

Added/removed cards:
-3 (SB) Crested Sunmare

Changed amounts:

10

Deck Reviews / Re: [Standard] Vampire Army

« on: December 12, 2017, 09:54:11 pm »

I have 4 ashes of Abhorrent in my main board already :/ but I think I may put in 1 or 2 overwhelming splendor in exchange with Legion's Landing. Because, thinking about it I wouldn't say the fact that it's legendary would make it disposable, but maybe just the cost efficiency. It wouldn't be very useful until late game spam. Which is a possibility but who knows. Idk why the legendary part is relevant tho tbh. It's a 1 Mana powerhouse that can really be incredibly useful. Sunmare is definitely just a more random sideboard card that I'd probably never rotate in. I just thought it'd be a nice way to aide and abed if I wanted.

11

Deck Reviews / Re: [Standard] Treasure Theft

« on: December 10, 2017, 08:38:50 pm »

Just wanted to say. I did some revisions to make it more counter-based (which it should be) and I think this might actually work. If I (literally) play my cards right, I should be able to keep most decks from being able to kill me before Revel in Riches comes out to play. The point, as anyone can see, is to build Treasure Artifacts until I have ten, in which, as Revel in Riches says, wins the game. If I can discard creatures and counter spells, I should, in theory, be able to do that with this deck. It's experimental and I'm just trying to use the Treasure mechanic in a interesting way. I'd appreciate any feedback because I honestly want to know what you guys think about it.

12

Deck Comments / Re: hmmmm - Comments

« on: December 10, 2017, 06:45:27 am »

I don't even know what to call this deck. Just plain dirty XD. But, well done. And, of course, the beauty, the annoyance, Liliana of the Veil. There's a reason she's not cheap!

13

Deck Comments / Re: Infect Turn 2 - Comments

« on: December 10, 2017, 06:38:27 am »

Really well done. I pulled 5 starting hands and didn't see any way to really counter anything within the first two turns. Maybe some blue counters to the counter spells and all, but, even with creatures, this deck is pretty much unstoppable. Also, pretty cheap. Well done!

14

Deck Reviews / [Standard] Treasure Theft

« on: December 10, 2017, 06:24:23 am »

Treasure Theft

Arg matey, I be swashbuckling and takin yer booty befer yuh can even say "AHOY"!

I'd like to hear anyone's thoughts! Thanks!

15

Deck Reviews / [Standard] Vampire Army

« on: December 10, 2017, 03:26:39 am »

Vampire Army

The conquistador vampires plan to ride their horses to glory, allowing for the hand of the Gods and their Queen's approval to lead them to a gracious victory in the name of life!