deckstats.net
You need to be logged in to do this.
The buttons above will open in a new window. Please return to this window after you have logged in. When you have logged in, click the Session aktualisieren button and then try again.

One man and his Pod // Pako and Haldan EDH // Birthing Pod (EDH / Commander) [Revision 62]

Für die meisten Magic-Programme, inklusive Magic Workstation und Cockatrice:

Für MTG Arena:

Für Magic Online (MTGO):

Für andere:

Um dein Deck auf einem offiziellen ("DCI-sanktioniertem") Turnier zu spielen, musst du ein Deck-Registrierungsformular ausfüllen. Hier kannst du solch ein Formular herunterladen, vorausgefüllt mit den Karten aus diesem Deck!

(-> Deine Einstellungen)

Beachte bitte: Dies ist kein offizieller Dienst der DCI. Stelle daher bitte immer noch mal sicher, dass der Zettel wirklich alle Karten aus deinem Deck enthält und alle Vorraussetzungen erfüllt. Wenn dir ein Fehler auffällt, sag uns bitte bescheid. DCI is a trademark of of Wizards of the Coast LLC.

Bitte wähle die Spalten, die du sehen möchtest

Zeige Revision 62. There is a more recent version of this deck.

DogPod: A Temur Birthing Pod deck helmed by Temur's strongest(?) commander pairing.

Below is a write-up of one of my favourite EDH decks. This list is crazy fun, very powerful at casual tables, and allows for some really interesting games.

Tl;Dr: Pako and Haldan are strong, and so is Birthing Pod. This deck is super fun and I'd recommend giving it a whirl or trying something similar if you like active decision-making while playing EDH.

Why Pod?

I've been playing EDH for around 2 years now, and I've put together somewhere between 10 and 14 decks over this time. Among these decks, I have some I have barely touched since that initial golden period immediately following building and sleeving-up. These decks tend to be those that offer little variability between games, or do not allow for much proactive decision-making. I've come to realise that what I love as a magic player is what I term agency: being able to actively choose from a range of possible lines of play what I believe to be the most appropriate for a given situation. In stark contrast to my barely-touched decks, those which have garnered my attention more actively and intensely (both in terms of continued list-tweaking and continued play) are those which offer variability and, crucially, agency. Take my Grixis spellslinger/storm deck for example (https://deckstats.net/decks/126763/1416834-jeleva-edh-big-spells-are-bett): no two games with this bad girl are the same - I'm always having to think proactively (as well as reactively) to determine which line I should take next. Decks like this can win fast, but it isn't the ability to win which attracts me so much as the engaging experience these decks provide. I was looking to put together a new creature-based deck, as I felt I had fallen out of love slightly with mine others due to lack of variability or agency (eg Goreclaw - dump fatties, turn sideways, pray no one casts a Wrath).

Enter birthing pod. Pod, and similar cards such as Prime Speaker Vannifar, provide a creature deck with both variability and agency. They enable the tutoring of situation-dependent creatures directly to the battlefield. Such cards offer huge power by virtue of providing with a totally different way to build a creature deck. They allow the inclusion of a multiplicity of one-off (so-called "toolbox") effects, combo lines, and answers to boardstates which creature decks can otherwise struggle with. Each turn playing a pod deck (and thereby each game playing a pod deck) is different - you ask yourself questions and come up with what you think is the best answer for the situation. Should I focus on developing my mana? Should I develop a threat? Should I start piecing together a combo or win condition? Should I take a turn out to answer some threats that would otherwise go unanswered? Is there a busted synergy available to me which I should capitalise on? Sure, you have to know your decklist inside-out, but pod decks can be incredibly fun for players, like myself, who enjoy a mixture of proactive and reactive gameplay.

Why Pako?

As discussed above, I love agency. I love being able to make choices that actively shape the game. And for this, we need cards. Pako provides us with a steady stream of card advantage in a way that is fun and unique, while himself putting pressure on our opponents resources (creatures or life-total depending on how inclined they are to block). it's not unreasonable for him to provide with 2-4 extra cards every time he attacks - and he doesn't even have to connect, which is huge (Tymna eat your heart out). Pako having haste is one of his key features - unless he gets insta-removed, he's always going to generate some value on the turn he comes down, which I love. Importantly, we can even play our opponents lands from the "fetch" zone, and therefore we can run slightly fewer of our own to make room for a bigger tutorable toolbox of good creatures. Sure, we can't play our creatures if Pako fetches them, but I've found that as long as our overall creature count is somewhere south of 30, this isn't too big of a deal. Furthermore, If we can get the good boi out early enough, he can become absolutely huge, presenting a viable win-condition via commander damage. Taking stock then, Pako and Haldan provide us with cards, pressure our opponents, and represents a plausible win/kill condition; this partner pairing has to be a candidate for the most generically good Temur general ever printed. It's also worth noting that we have 2 different CMCs in the command zone, opening up lines for birthing pod effects should we elect to sacrifice our commanders to them in a pinch. Oh, and the art/foiling is gorgeous. 10/10 commander.

General strategy.

Early game:

We need to get the dog out early to take advantage of the cards he provides and the pressure he puts on our opponents. Mulligan until you find ramp (of which there is plenty in the list) and aim for a turn 3-4 Pako. Get swinging, and dig for cards.

Mid game / value engines:

Ideally, we're looking to find some birthing pod pieces to let us dictate the pace of the game. If we can find birthing pod or Vannifar, we're in the money: now we can assess the boardstate and actively decide which of our toolbox creatures is most appropriate at any given time. Need to develop some mana? Find Azusa. Need to slow down the opponents? Venser, Shaper Savant or Reclemation Sage might be appropriate. Looking to generate value++? Look no further than Spark Double - what could be better than two Pakos?

A wide toolbox lets us react to what cards become available to us. If we land a Leyline of Ancitipation, then podding out either Rashmi, Eternities Crafter or Seedborn Muse can only lead to good things. As above, knowing the decklist inside-out is crucial when playing pod.

If we can't find any pod pieces, then we switch to plan B: protect Pako with countermagic or on-board protection and start chipping away at life totals. Various cards support this approrach (Aqueous Form; Rancor; Whispersilk Cloak; Guardian Augmenter; Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar etc).

Late game / top of curve / win conditions.

Notable inclusions.

Notable exclusions.

Cards to consider.

Final thoughts.

Tags

Maybeboard

Dieses Deck scheint in EDH / Commander legal zu sein!

Turn: Dein Leben: Gegners Leben: Poison-Zähler:
Hand (0)
Bibliothek (0)
Friedhof (0)
Exil (0)
Board (0)

Name

Typ

Notizen

Angriff

Verteidigung

card

Typ

Notizen

Angriff

Verteidigung

 

Zähler

Verschiebe diese Karte nach:

Aktionen

2-seitig (Münzwurf)
6-seitig (d6)
20-seitig (d20)
Seiten:

Auto-Ziehen

Auto-Enttappen

Doppelklicken, um Kartendetails zu öffnen

Gewählte verschieben nach:

Kombinierte Wahrscheinlichkeit

Mindestanzahl:
Karte:

Eigene berechnung

Wenn ich eine Karte mal in meinem ?-Karten-Deck spiele, wie wahrscheinlich ist es dann, dass ich sie mal ziehe?
  Name Hand Turn 1 Turn 2 Turn 3 Turn 4 Turn 5 Turn 6 Turn 7 Turn 8 Turn 9 Turn 10

Weitere Wahrscheinlichkeiten

In Forum oder Webseite einbinden

Für Foren und Blogs benutze bitte eine der BB-Code-Optionen. Für Webseiten und Foren, die HTML unterstützen, kannst du die HTML-Optionen benutzen!

Link zu diesem Deck

Here are some suggestions for cards you could add to your deck, based on decks that other players have built with this Commander.

Please add some cards to the deck to see card suggestions.

Unfortunately, we could not detect a Commander in this deck. Please choose it here to view card suggestions. To make sure this deck is analyzed properly in the future, please flag your Commander in the deckbuilder or put it in a separate section called "Commander".
Punkte Kartenname Typ Mana Seltenheit Salt
Powered by edhrec.com!
Dies sind alle verfügbaren Revisionen dieses Decks. Klicke auf eine Revisionen, um das Deck zu sehen, wie es zu diesem Zeitpunkt aussah.
  Vergleichen Revision Erstellt Von
Revision 70 August 6, 2022 aacwright
Revision 69 Oktober 10, 2021 aacwright
Revision 68 Oktober 10, 2021 aacwright
Revision 67 Juli 21, 2021 aacwright
Revision 66 Juli 21, 2021 aacwright
Revision 65 Juli 19, 2021 aacwright
Revision 64 Juli 19, 2021 aacwright
Revision 63 Juli 19, 2021 aacwright
» Revision 62 Juli 19, 2021 aacwright
Revision 61 Juli 17, 2021 aacwright
Revision 60 Juli 15, 2021 aacwright
Revision 59 Juli 15, 2021 aacwright
Revision 58 Juli 15, 2021 aacwright
Revision 57 Juli 15, 2021 aacwright
Revision 56 Juli 15, 2021 aacwright
Revision 55 Juni 3, 2021 aacwright
Revision 54 März 31, 2021 aacwright
Revision 53 März 29, 2021 aacwright
Revision 52 März 19, 2021 aacwright
Revision 51 Januar 29, 2021 aacwright
Revision 50 Dezember 18, 2020 aacwright
Revision 49 Dezember 6, 2020 aacwright
Revision 48 Dezember 6, 2020 aacwright
Revision 47 Dezember 6, 2020 aacwright
Revision 46 Dezember 5, 2020 aacwright
Revision 45 Dezember 5, 2020 aacwright
Revision 44 November 14, 2020 aacwright
Revision 43 November 13, 2020 aacwright
Revision 42 November 9, 2020 aacwright
Revision 41 Oktober 11, 2020 aacwright
Revision 40 Oktober 7, 2020 aacwright
Revision 39 Oktober 6, 2020 aacwright
Revision 38 September 30, 2020 aacwright
Revision 37 September 30, 2020 aacwright
Revision 36 September 30, 2020 aacwright
Revision 35 September 29, 2020 aacwright
Revision 34 September 29, 2020 aacwright
Revision 33 September 29, 2020 aacwright
Revision 32 September 29, 2020 aacwright
Revision 31 September 29, 2020 aacwright
Revision 30 September 29, 2020 aacwright
Revision 29 September 29, 2020 aacwright
Revision 28 September 28, 2020 aacwright
Revision 27 September 28, 2020 aacwright
Revision 26 September 28, 2020 aacwright
Revision 25 September 28, 2020 aacwright
Revision 24 September 28, 2020 aacwright
Revision 23 September 28, 2020 aacwright
Revision 22 September 28, 2020 aacwright
Revision 21 September 28, 2020 aacwright
Revision 20 September 28, 2020 aacwright
Revision 19 September 27, 2020 aacwright
Revision 18 September 27, 2020 aacwright
Revision 17 September 27, 2020 aacwright
Revision 16 September 26, 2020 aacwright
Revision 15 September 26, 2020 aacwright
Revision 14 September 26, 2020 aacwright
Revision 13 September 26, 2020 aacwright
Revision 12 September 26, 2020 aacwright
Revision 11 September 24, 2020 aacwright
Revision 10 September 24, 2020 aacwright
Revision 9 September 24, 2020 aacwright
Revision 8 September 24, 2020 aacwright
Revision 7 September 24, 2020 aacwright
Revision 6 September 24, 2020 aacwright
Revision 5 September 24, 2020 aacwright
Revision 4 September 24, 2020 aacwright
Revision 3 September 24, 2020 aacwright
Revision 2 September 24, 2020 aacwright
Revision 1 September 24, 2020 aacwright
Es gibt noch keine Kommentare zu diesem Deck.
Englische Kartennamen werden automatisch verlinkt.
Zusätzlich kannst du hier BBCode (wie [b][/b], [url=...][/url] usw.) benutzen!

An error with your login session occured:
unknown
You can do this in a different tab to avoid losing the data you entered here. Once you are done, click the Session aktualisieren button and then try again.
If the problem persists, please contact us.